El Sayed, E., Khalil, A., Saleh, M. (2015). CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT VERSUS DELAYED IMPLANT AFTER SOCKET PRESERVATION OF UPPER ANTERIOR TEETH. Alexandria Dental Journal, 40(1), 79-85. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58740
E El Sayed; A Khalil; M Saleh. "CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT VERSUS DELAYED IMPLANT AFTER SOCKET PRESERVATION OF UPPER ANTERIOR TEETH". Alexandria Dental Journal, 40, 1, 2015, 79-85. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58740
El Sayed, E., Khalil, A., Saleh, M. (2015). 'CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT VERSUS DELAYED IMPLANT AFTER SOCKET PRESERVATION OF UPPER ANTERIOR TEETH', Alexandria Dental Journal, 40(1), pp. 79-85. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58740
El Sayed, E., Khalil, A., Saleh, M. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT VERSUS DELAYED IMPLANT AFTER SOCKET PRESERVATION OF UPPER ANTERIOR TEETH. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2015; 40(1): 79-85. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58740
CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT VERSUS DELAYED IMPLANT AFTER SOCKET PRESERVATION OF UPPER ANTERIOR TEETH
1B.D.S., Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Abstract
Introduction: After tooth extraction, the alveolar bone remodeled and resorbed. The preservation of ridge resorption following tooth extraction through socket grafting helped to optimize bony fill, thereby maintaining vertical bone height and helped to stabilize the marginal soft tissue at the site. Adequate bone allowed the implant to be placed in the most ideal restorable position in a three dimensional aspect which yielded higher longterm success. Objectives: Clinical and radiographical evaluation of immediate post extraction implants versus delayed implants after socket preservation. Materials and Methods: 14 patients were selected for this study and divided into two groups, study group consist of 7 patients with extracted upper anterior teeth and the sockets have been preserved with Easy-graft material, the implants were placed after 6 months of healing. In control group implants were placed immediately after extraction of upper anterior teeth with placement of Easy-graft material around them. Results: Clinical evaluation of all patients showed no signs of gingival inflammation and none of the implants showed any signs of mobility all over the study period. Regarding peri-implant probing depth and marginal bone height, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: There was no difference between immediate implant and delayed implant after socket preservation with regards to the marginal bone height and bone density.
1. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, et al. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol. 1998; 69: 1044-9. 2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft-tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12- month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 313-23. 3. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontal. 2008; 79: 1370-7. 4. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP, Schupbach P, Berglundh T. Alveolar ridge augmentation with Bio- Oss: a histologic study in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21: 288-95. 5. Becker W, Clokie C, Sennerby L, Urist MR, Becker BE. Histologic findings after implantation and evaluation of different grafting materials and titanium micro screws into extraction sockets: case reports. J Periodontol. 1998; 69: 414-21. 6. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B et al. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 90: 581-6. 7. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets: 2. Histochemical observations at 9 months. J Periodontol. 2001; 72: 152-9. 8. Froum S, Orlowski W. Ridge preservation utilizing an alloplasts prior to implant placement - clinical and histological case reports. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000; 12: 393-402. 9. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003; 74: 990-9. 10. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bon graft materials:An overview of the basic Science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 371: 10-27. 11. Easy-graft®CRYSTAL-DegradableSolutionsAG[PDF]
12. Steflik D, Koth DL, Robinson F, Mckinney R, Davis B, Morris C, et al. prospective investigation of the single- crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: Ten-year results. J Oral Implantol. 1995; 21: 8-18. 13. Lobene RR, Weatherford T, Ross NM, Lamm RA, Menaker L. A modified gingival index for use in clinical trials. Clinical Preventive Dentistry. 1986;8:3-6. 14. Glavind L, Loe H. Errors in clinical assessment of periodontal destruction. J Periodontol. 1967;2: 180-6.
15. Abramoff MD, Magelhase PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with image J. Biophonetics Interational. 2004; 11: 36-42. 16. Tassos Irinakis. rational for socket preservation after extraction of single rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72: 917-22. 17. Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24:260-71. 18. Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, Benfenati SP. Long- term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1–5 year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 35-45. 19. Nociti F, Cesar N, Carvalho M, Sallum E. Bone denisty around titanium implants may be influenced by intermittent cigarette smoke inhalation: A histometric study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 347-52 20. Strbac GD, Unger E, Donner R, Bijak M, Watzek G, Zechner W. Thermal effects of acombined irrigation method during implant site drilling. A standdized in vitro study using a bovin rib model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 665-74. 21. Lee J, Ozdoganlar OB, Rabin Y. An exprimental investigation on thermal exposure during bone drilling. Med Eng Phys. 2012; 34: 1510-20. 22. Augustin G, Davila S, Udillijak T, Staroveski T, Brezak D, Babic S. Temperature changes during cortical bone drilling with a newly designed step drill and an internally cooled drill. Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 1449-56. 23. Zoghbi SA, De lima LA, Saraiva L, Romito GA. Surgical experience influences two stages implant osseointegration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69: 2771-6. 24. Ormianer Z, Palti A, Thoma K, Pajarola GF, Kan W, Shifman A. Servival of immediately placed dental implants in deficient alveolar bone sites augmented with beta-tricalcium phosphate. Implant Dent. 2006;15:395- 403 25. Porter J, Von Fraunhofer J, Success or failure of dental implants?A literature review with treatment considerations. General Dent. 2005; 423-32. 26. Hossein K, Dahlin C, Bengt A. Influence of different prophylactic antibiotic regimens on implant survival rate: Aretrospective clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7: 32-5. 27. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Tzanetea E, Piattelli A, Worthington H V. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of perimplantitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 6: CD004970. 28. Al-Ansari, Bader H, Robert R. Morris. "Placement of dental implants without flap surgery: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13: 861-5.
View on SCiNiTO
Top