Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Abdelsalam, I., Aboushady, Y., Hussein, S. (2021). COMPARISON OF THE FIT ACCURACY OF HYBRID CERAMIC PROSTHESES GENERATED BY THREE CAD-CAM SYSTEMS. Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), 123-128. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.37430.1092
Islam Abdelrahman Abdelsalam; Yehia Aboushady; Sanaa Hussein. "COMPARISON OF THE FIT ACCURACY OF HYBRID CERAMIC PROSTHESES GENERATED BY THREE CAD-CAM SYSTEMS". Alexandria Dental Journal, 46, 3, 2021, 123-128. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.37430.1092
Abdelsalam, I., Aboushady, Y., Hussein, S. (2021). 'COMPARISON OF THE FIT ACCURACY OF HYBRID CERAMIC PROSTHESES GENERATED BY THREE CAD-CAM SYSTEMS', Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), pp. 123-128. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.37430.1092
Abdelsalam, I., Aboushady, Y., Hussein, S. COMPARISON OF THE FIT ACCURACY OF HYBRID CERAMIC PROSTHESES GENERATED BY THREE CAD-CAM SYSTEMS. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2021; 46(3): 123-128. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.37430.1092

COMPARISON OF THE FIT ACCURACY OF HYBRID CERAMIC PROSTHESES GENERATED BY THREE CAD-CAM SYSTEMS

Article 7, Volume 46, Issue 3, December 2021, Page 123-128  XML PDF (986.85 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.37430.1092
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Islam Abdelrahman Abdelsalam email 1; Yehia Aboushady2; Sanaa Husseinorcid 3
1fixed prosthodontics , Alexandria university, Alexandria ,EGYPT
2conservative Department,Faculty of Dentistry , Alexandria ,Egypt
3Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University.
Abstract
Background: Marginal and internal fit are believed to be one of the most important guideline in the assessment of ceramic restorations and are one of the most remarkable requirement for the long-term performance of fixed dental prostheses.
PURPOSE: Was to evaluate the influence of different CAD-CAM systems on the marginal and internal adaptation of hybrid ceramic restorations.
Materials and Methods: Lower right six of a typodont resin cast with a 1.0 mm circumferential chamfer finish line, an occlusal reduction of 2.0 mm, and an average of 10-12° convergence angle was prepared. This master die was duplicated to thirty acrylic resin dies milled from PMMA discs using CAD-CAM technique. Vita Enamic monolithic crowns were manufactured using three different CAD-CAM systems Ceramill, Zirkonzahn and CEREC InLab systems (n=10). Replica technique procedure was used to assess marginal and internal fit of the fabricated prostheses by measuring the thickness of light body impression material between the master die and the restoration at five points using digital microscope.
Results: Measurements were collected for each group and appropriate statistical analysis was carried out.
Conclusion: CEREC system showed relatively lower marginal and internal discrepancy in a comparison with the other systems. Therefore, there is a significant difference among the three systems.
Keywords
Marginal fit; Internal fit; CAD-CAM; VITA Enamic; Replica
Main Subjects
Fixed prosthodontics
References
Hannink RHJ, Kelly PM, Muddle BC. Transformation toughening in zirconia-containing ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 2000;83:461-87.

    • Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98:389-404.

    • Baig MR, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104:216-27.

    • Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204:505-11.

    • Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:405-8.

    • Heintze S. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory test on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:77-106.

    • Biscaro L, Bonfiglioli R, Soattin M, Vigolo P. An in vivo evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide based ceramic single crowns, generated with two CAD/CAM systems, in comparison to metal ceramic single crowns. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:36-41.

    • Tannamala P, Azhagarasan NS, Shankar K. Evaluation of marginal gap of Ni-Cr copings made with conventional and accelerated casting techniques. Indian J Dent Res. 2013;24:146-8.

    • Beuer F, Korczynski N, Rezac A, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Marginal and Internal Fit of Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated With Different Concepts. Clinical Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2010;2:5-11.

    • McLean JW, von Frauenhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131:107-11.

    • Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all‐ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J. 1995;40:17-21.

    • Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.

    • Correia A, Sampaio Fernandes J, Cardoso J, Leal-Da-Silva C. CAD-CAM: informatics applied to fixed prosthodontics. Rev Odontol UNESP 2006;35:183-9.

    • Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:72-84.

    • Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:18- 24.

    • Falk A, Vult von Steyern P, Fransson H, Thorén MM. Reliability of the impression replica technique. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28:179-80.

    • Trifković B, Budak I, Todorović A. Application of replica technique and SEM in accuracy measurement of ceramic crowns. Meas Sci Rev. 2012;12:90-7.

    • Coli P, Karlsson S. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:59-64.

    • LaurentM,ScheerP,DejouJ,LabordeG.Clinicalevaluationofthemarginalfitofcastcrowns-validationofthe

    silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:116-22.

    • Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different

    InCeram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009;4:278-92.

    • Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, EL-Hossary MMK, Katamish HAEM, Shokry TE, Rosenstiel SF. Accuracy of ceramic

    restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:83-7.

    • Gassino G, Barone Monfrin S, Scanu M,Spina G, Preti G. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: A new

    in vitro360-degree external examination procedure. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:218-23.

    • Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-

    ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:587-92.

    • Rink S, Huls A, Jahn L. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled all-ceramic

    crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;8:303-10.

    • Albert FE, El-Mowafy OM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four

    cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:529-35.

    • Azarbal A, Azarbal M, Engelmeier RL, Kunkel TC. Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from

    Two Different Materials. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:421-8.

    • Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown

    fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102:253-9.

    Ha SJ, Cho JH. Comparison of the fit accuracy of zirconia-based prostheses generated by two CAD/CAM systems. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:439-48.

    • LaurentM,ScheerP,DejouJ,LabordeG.Clinicalevaluationofthemarginalfitofcastcrowns-validationofthe silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:116-22.

    • Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, Ohkubo C, Fukushima S, Vult von Steyern P. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:753-8.

    • Rajan BN, Jayaraman S, Kandhasamy B, Rajakumaran I. Evaluation of marginal fit and internal adaptation of zirconia copings fabricated by two CAD - CAM systems: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015;15:173-8.

    • Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:554-9.

    • Suárez MJJ, Vernimmen FS, Merchán EAR. Comparison of marginal fit of zirconia copings manufactured with the use of two CAD/CAM systems Cerec InLab (Sirona®) CAD/CAM Zirkonzahn (Zirkonzahn®) and Zirkograph 025 ECO pantographic system (manual milling system)(Zirkonzahn®). Revista Odontológica Mexicana 2015;19:240-5.

    • Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-cermic three-unit s xed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:174-9.

    • Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A. Fit of single tooth copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105:249-55.

    • KohorstP,JunghannsJ,DittmerMP,BorchersL,StieschM.DifferentCAD/CAM-processingroutesforzirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:527-36.

    • Pfeiffer J. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (I). Int J Comput Dent.1998;1:29-33.

    • Willer J, Rossbach A, Weber HP. Computer-assisted milling of dental restorations using a new CAD/CAM data

    acquisition system. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:346-53.

    • Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress,

    and Procera Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-84.

    Statistics
    Article View: 344
    PDF Download: 790