Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Abdel motagly, M., El Khadem, A., Abdel Rassoul, M. (2021). ASSESSMENT OF LOW-SPEED DRILLING WITHOUT IRRIGATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING WITH IRRIGATION REGARDING HEAT GENERATION AND PERI-IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS (RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL). Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(Issue 2), 33-38. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.58075.1154
Mahmoud Abdel motagly; Amr El Khadem; Mohamed Atef Abdel Rassoul. "ASSESSMENT OF LOW-SPEED DRILLING WITHOUT IRRIGATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING WITH IRRIGATION REGARDING HEAT GENERATION AND PERI-IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS (RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL)". Alexandria Dental Journal, 46, Issue 2, 2021, 33-38. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.58075.1154
Abdel motagly, M., El Khadem, A., Abdel Rassoul, M. (2021). 'ASSESSMENT OF LOW-SPEED DRILLING WITHOUT IRRIGATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING WITH IRRIGATION REGARDING HEAT GENERATION AND PERI-IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS (RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL)', Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(Issue 2), pp. 33-38. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.58075.1154
Abdel motagly, M., El Khadem, A., Abdel Rassoul, M. ASSESSMENT OF LOW-SPEED DRILLING WITHOUT IRRIGATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING WITH IRRIGATION REGARDING HEAT GENERATION AND PERI-IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS (RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL). Alexandria Dental Journal, 2021; 46(Issue 2): 33-38. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.58075.1154

ASSESSMENT OF LOW-SPEED DRILLING WITHOUT IRRIGATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRILLING WITH IRRIGATION REGARDING HEAT GENERATION AND PERI-IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS (RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL)

Article 6, Volume 46, Issue 2, August 2021, Page 33-38  XML PDF (1.06 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.58075.1154
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mahmoud Abdel motagly email orcid 1; Amr El Khademorcid 2; Mohamed Atef Abdel Rassoulorcid 3
1Dpartment of oral implantology , Faculty of dentistry Cairo university
2Oral and Dental Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Abstract
Introduction: Most implant systems use drilling with irrigation to avoid the overheating of the bone. In the relatively high speed technique, irrigation may not reach the full depth of osteotomy. This triggered the use of low speed drilling technique without irrigation.
Objectives: were the assessment of heat generation and marginal bone loss around implants placed by drilling speed 150 rpm without irrigation compared with implants placed by drilling speed 1200 rpm with irrigation up to one-year follow up. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 patients were enrolled in this study. Forty implants were placed bilaterally in the posterior mandibular region. Each patient received the two types of drilling techniques. The temperature of the bone was measured before and after the implant site preparation by thermocouples. The marginal bone loss was evaluated by CBCT. Results: there was statistically different in temperature of bone between the two drilling techniques. Marginal bone loss showed no statistical difference. Conclusion: Low speed drilling 150 rpm without irrigation is a successful and applicable drilling technique in implant site preparation regardless of its relatively high temperature, as it did not exceed the critical limit.
Keywords
dental implant placement; low-speed drilling without irrigation; heat generation; thermocouples; biological drilling
Main Subjects
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
References
  1. Anitua, E. Biological drilling: Implant site preparation in a conservative manner and obtaining autogenous bone grafts. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine.2018; 22, 98-101.‏
  2. Gehrke, S. A., Bettach, R., Taschieri, S., Boukhris, G., Corbella, S., and Del Fabbro, M. Temperature changes in cortical bone after implant site preparation using a single bur versus multiple drilling steps: an in vitro investigation. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2015; 17:700-707.
  3. Pellicer-Chover, H., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., Aloy-Prosper, A., Sanchis-Gonzalez, J. C., Peñarrocha-Diago, M., and Peñarrocha-Diago, M. Comparison of peri-implant bone loss between conventional drilling with irrigation versus low-speed drilling without irrigation. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugiabucal.2017; 22:730–736.
  4. Ribeiro Junior, P. D., Barleto, C. V., Ribeiro, D. A., and Matsumoto, M. A. Evaluation of different rotary devices on bone repair in rabbits. Brazilian dental journal.2007; 18:215-219.
  5. Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M, Perfetti G. Insufficient irrigation induces peri-implant bone resorption: an in vivo histologic analysis in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25:696-701.
  6. Anitua E, Carda C, Andia I. A novel drilling procedure and subsequent bone autograft preparation: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22:138-45. Erratum in: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:309.
  7. Kim SJ, Yoo J, Kim YS, Shin SW. Temperature change in pig rib bone during implant site preparation by low-speed drilling. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:522-7. 
  8. Giro G, Marin C, Granato R, Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Effect of drilling technique on the early integration of plateau root form endosteal implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69:2158-63. 
  9. Pirjamalineisiani A, Jamshidi N, Sarafbidabad M, Soltani N. Assessment of experimental thermal, numerical, and mandibular drilling factors in implantology. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 ;54:400-4.
  10. Oh JH, Fang Y, Jeong SM, Choi BH. The effect of low-speed drilling without irrigation on heat generation: an experimental study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 42:9-12. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.1.9.
  11. Alam K, Al-Ghaithi A, Piya S, Saleem A. In-vitro experimental study of histopathology of bone in vibrational drilling. Medical engineering & physics. 2019;67:78-87.
  12. Calvo-Guirado, J. L., Delgado-Peña, J., Maté-Sánchez, J. E., Mareque Bueno, J., Delgado-Ruiz, R. A., and Romanos, G. E. Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing–thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone to implant contact. Clinical oral implants research.2015;26:753- 760.
  13. Iyer, S., Weiss, C., and Mehta, A. Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part II: Relationship between drill speed and healing. International Journal of Prosthodontics.1997;10:411-414.
  14. Reingewirtz, Y., Szmukler-Moncler, S. and Senger, B. Influence of different parameters on bone heating and drilling time in implantology, Clinical oral implants research.1997;8:189–97.
  15. Gaspar J, Borrecho G, Oliveira P, Salvado F, Martins dos Santos J. Osteotomy at low-speed drilling without irrigation versus high-speed drilling with irrigation: an experimental study. Acta medica portuguesa. 2013;26:231-6.
  16. Leja C, Geminiani A, Caton J, Romanos GE. Thermodynamic effects of laser irradiation of implants placed in bone: an in vitro study. Lasers in medical science. 2013; 28:1435-40.
  17. Feuerstein O, Zeichner K, Imbari C, Ormianer Z, Samet N, Weiss EI. Temperature changes in dental implants following exposure to hot substances in an ex vivo model. Clinical oral implants research. 2008;19:629-33
  18. Rashad A, Kaiser A, Prochnow N, Schmitz I, Hoffmann E, Maurer P. Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants. Clinical oral implants research. 2011;22:1361-5.
  19. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2002;60:1160-9.
  20. Tehemar SH. Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 ;14:127-36
  21. Eriksson, A. R. and Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat- induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.1983;50:101–107.
  22. Eriksson, R. A. and Albrektsson, T.The effect of heat on bone regeneration: an experimental study in the rabbit using the bone growth chamber. ‘, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.1984;42:705–711.
  23. Nedir, R., Bischof, M., Szmukler-Moncler, S., Bernard, J. P., and Samson, J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability: A resonance-frequency analysis study with delayed and immediately loaded ITI SLA implants. Clinical oral implants research.2004;15:520-528.
Statistics
Article View: 737
PDF Download: 921