• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Special Issue for the 22nd Alexandria International Dental Congress, Egyptian IADR, and the 5th International Congress of the Egyptian Pediatric Dentistry Association
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Abdel Ghany, S., Kehela, H., Abdel-Fattah, W. (2022). EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF MAXILLARY PREMOLAR TEETH RESTORED WITH CAD/CAM INLAYS AND ONLAYS (IN-VITRO STUDY). Alexandria Dental Journal, 47(2), 155-161. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.62472.1160
Samar Gamal Abdel Ghany; Hany Abdel Ghaffar Kehela; Wegdan Mohamed Abdel-Fattah. "EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF MAXILLARY PREMOLAR TEETH RESTORED WITH CAD/CAM INLAYS AND ONLAYS (IN-VITRO STUDY)". Alexandria Dental Journal, 47, 2, 2022, 155-161. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.62472.1160
Abdel Ghany, S., Kehela, H., Abdel-Fattah, W. (2022). 'EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF MAXILLARY PREMOLAR TEETH RESTORED WITH CAD/CAM INLAYS AND ONLAYS (IN-VITRO STUDY)', Alexandria Dental Journal, 47(2), pp. 155-161. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.62472.1160
Abdel Ghany, S., Kehela, H., Abdel-Fattah, W. EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF MAXILLARY PREMOLAR TEETH RESTORED WITH CAD/CAM INLAYS AND ONLAYS (IN-VITRO STUDY). Alexandria Dental Journal, 2022; 47(2): 155-161. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.62472.1160

EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF MAXILLARY PREMOLAR TEETH RESTORED WITH CAD/CAM INLAYS AND ONLAYS (IN-VITRO STUDY)

Article 9, Volume 47, Issue 2, August 2022, Page 155-161  XML PDF (446.42 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.62472.1160
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Samar Gamal Abdel Ghany email ; Hany Abdel Ghaffar Kehela; Wegdan Mohamed Abdel-Fattah
Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Abstract
Introduction: Fracture resistance of teeth is affected by cavity preparation design and type of restorative material. Combination of ceramic and polymer phases resulted in materials with better properties and can be used for fabrication of indirect restorations with the CAD/CAM technology.
Objective: To evaluate fracture resistance and mode of fracture of maxillary premolar teeth restored with inlays and onlays fabricated from different CAD/CAM materials.
Methods: Forty-five sound human maxillary premolars were used. Nine specimens were left intact as control group (Group I). The rest were divided into two groups (n=18); MOD inlay (Group II) and MOD complete onlay (Group III). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups (n=9) according to the materials used; VITA Enamic (VE) and Lava Ultimate (LU). Cementation was done by self-adhesive resin cement RelyX™ U200. Specimens were subjected to thermocycling and fracture resistance test was done using a universal testing machine. Mode of fracture was detected by stereomicroscope. Data was analyzed using Two Way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Fracture mode was compared using Monte Carlo simulation of Pearson Chi Square test.
Results: Statistical significant difference was found between control group and Group IIIa (VE onlays) and Group IIIb (LU onlays), with no significant difference among other groups. Pattern I mode of fracture was shown mostly in the onlays while VE inlays demonstrated Pattern III and most LU inlays showed Pattern IV.
Conclusions: Inlays showed the highest fracture resistance. Vita Enamic and Lava Ultimate showed comparable results regarding fracture resistance, regardless of the preparation design.
Keywords
Inlay; Onlay; Fracture resistance; Vita Enamic; Lava Ultimate
Main Subjects
Conservative dentistry
Statistics
Article View: 372
PDF Download: 789
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.