• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Abozhw, S., Osman, S., Sweedan, A., moustafa, H. (2023). EVALUATION OF BONE AUGMENTATION UNDER PERFORATED AND NON PERFORATED CERAMIC SPACE MAINTAINING DEVICE (EXPERIMENTAL STUDY). Alexandria Dental Journal, 48(1), 44-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.110822.1237
Saad Eldin Saad Abozhw; Saeeda Mahmoud Osman; Ahmed Ossama Sweedan; Hossam eldin Mohammed moustafa. "EVALUATION OF BONE AUGMENTATION UNDER PERFORATED AND NON PERFORATED CERAMIC SPACE MAINTAINING DEVICE (EXPERIMENTAL STUDY)". Alexandria Dental Journal, 48, 1, 2023, 44-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.110822.1237
Abozhw, S., Osman, S., Sweedan, A., moustafa, H. (2023). 'EVALUATION OF BONE AUGMENTATION UNDER PERFORATED AND NON PERFORATED CERAMIC SPACE MAINTAINING DEVICE (EXPERIMENTAL STUDY)', Alexandria Dental Journal, 48(1), pp. 44-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.110822.1237
Abozhw, S., Osman, S., Sweedan, A., moustafa, H. EVALUATION OF BONE AUGMENTATION UNDER PERFORATED AND NON PERFORATED CERAMIC SPACE MAINTAINING DEVICE (EXPERIMENTAL STUDY). Alexandria Dental Journal, 2023; 48(1): 44-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.110822.1237

EVALUATION OF BONE AUGMENTATION UNDER PERFORATED AND NON PERFORATED CERAMIC SPACE MAINTAINING DEVICE (EXPERIMENTAL STUDY)

Article 6, Volume 48, Issue 1, April 2023, Page 44-50  XML PDF (656.3 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.110822.1237
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Saad Eldin Saad Abozhw email 1; Saeeda Mahmoud Osman2; Ahmed Ossama Sweedan3; Hossam eldin Mohammed moustafa4
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
4Department of Oral Biology ,Faculty of dentistry, Alexandria University
Abstract
Background: Alveolar bone deficiency is one of most common problems encountered with oral rehabilitation. Many bone augmentation techniques have been documented, one of them is augmentation by bone grafting and barrier membranes, ceramic membrane proved efficiency in guided bone regeneration duo to enhanced properties.
Aim of this study: Evaluation of bone surface area under perforated ceramic membrane in relation to non perforated ceramic membrane.
Materials and methods: 14 mongorel dogs divided in to two equal groups, study group used bone graft, cortical perforation and perforated ceramic membrane, control group used bone graft, cortical perforation and non perforated ceramic membrane, follow up for 12 weeks and scarification was done retrieving ceramic mebrane with samples of new bone which histologically prepared for histomorphometric analysis.
Results: By histological evaluation more cellularity and vascularity, better trabecular arrangement and lesser granulation tissues were noted under perforated ceramic group. By histomorphometric analysis statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 and higher bone surface area with mean value of 40.09 ± 3.50 associated with perforated group in comparison with mean value of 19.92 ± 3.63 associated with occlusive group.
Conclusion: Perforated ceramic membrane is comparable to occlusive one in terms of higher bone surface area, reduced granulation tissues and favorable blood supply.
Keywords
Guided bone augmentation; Ceramic membrane; Cortical perforation
Main Subjects
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
Statistics
Article View: 281
PDF Download: 436
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.