• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Farid, M., Abbas, F., Mehanna, R., Abd-ELLAH, M. (2023). BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF 3D PRINTED PHOTOINITIATED PROSTHODONTIC RESINS (In vitro Study). Alexandria Dental Journal, 48(2), 132-138. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.127594.1263
Maisa Mohamed Farid; Faten Salah Eldin Abbas; Radwa Ali Mehanna; Mervat E Abd-ELLAH. "BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF 3D PRINTED PHOTOINITIATED PROSTHODONTIC RESINS (In vitro Study)". Alexandria Dental Journal, 48, 2, 2023, 132-138. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.127594.1263
Farid, M., Abbas, F., Mehanna, R., Abd-ELLAH, M. (2023). 'BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF 3D PRINTED PHOTOINITIATED PROSTHODONTIC RESINS (In vitro Study)', Alexandria Dental Journal, 48(2), pp. 132-138. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.127594.1263
Farid, M., Abbas, F., Mehanna, R., Abd-ELLAH, M. BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF 3D PRINTED PHOTOINITIATED PROSTHODONTIC RESINS (In vitro Study). Alexandria Dental Journal, 2023; 48(2): 132-138. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.127594.1263

BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF 3D PRINTED PHOTOINITIATED PROSTHODONTIC RESINS (In vitro Study)

Article 9, Volume 48, Issue 2, August 2023, Page 132-138  XML PDF (437.55 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.127594.1263
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Maisa Mohamed Farid email 1; Faten Salah Eldin Abbas2; Radwa Ali Mehanna3; Mervat E Abd-ELLAH4
1Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
2Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
3Department of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
4Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
Introduction: The production of numerous types of materials for diverse uses in dentistry is a rapidly growing and research-intensive field. Although 3D printed resins are among the many materials utilized in prosthetic appliances today, research on their biocompatibility in long-term dental applications is limited.
Objective: Evaluation of cellular behavior of human gingival fibroblasts "HGFs" when put in contact with 3D photoinitiated printed resins and heat polymerized acrylic resin.
Methodology: HGFs were isolated from attached keratinized gingival tissues from healthy patients who had crown lengthening procedures, cellular viability using MTT assay in response to 3D printed resin Dental LT Clear (FORM LABS), compared to Heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Acrostone) which was assessed throughout four-time intervals (24, 48, 72 and 168 hours).
Results: All groups' cell viability decreased over time, although with favorable cell viability of more than 90% and non-cytotoxicity. It was found to be significant among Heat polymerized acrylic resin (RG), while among Dental LT Clear (TG) the decrease in cell viability were statistically insignificant. The highest cell viability was found after 24 hours among all groups; however, the least viability was found after 48 hours among RG, and among TG after 72 hours. There was a non-statistical significant difference in cell viability after 168 hours.
Conclusion: Throughout time intervals and for long term use, it was found that photoinitiated resin were less cytotoxic than heat polymerized acrylic resin but with no statistically significant difference.
Keywords
Biocompatibility; 3D printed photoinitiated resins; CAD/CAM; Cytotoxicity
Main Subjects
Prosthodontics
Statistics
Article View: 336
PDF Download: 566
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.