DIGITAL ASSESSMENT OF POSITIONAL ACCURACY OF DIFFERENT SPLINTING MULTIIMPLANT IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES: AN IN VITRO COMPARATIVE STUDY

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 prosthdontics department, faculty of dentistry, alexandria university.

2 Assistant lecturer of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

3 Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Background: Splinting of multiple implants during impression with the most accurate material to reproduce their intraoral relationship is deemed necessary for achieving passively fitting prosthesis.
Aim of the study: To assess positional accuracy of multiimplant impressions for completely edentulous arches obtained by a 3D printed splint and compare the results obtained with those obtained with conventional methods.
Material and methods: One mandibular epoxy model with 4 parallel implants was used as master reference model. A total of 24 (n=24) open tray impressions were done using a custom-made tray and were poured in dental stone. Eight impressions were done with 3D printed splint (group I), 8 were done with the conventional splinting method (group II), and 8 were done with sectional splinting method (group III). Four impression posts were attached to each cast, and all casts were scanned using a desktop scanner. Surface scans for the 3 groups were superimposed with the scan of the master reference model. The positional accuracy of each post was compared with the reference model to assess positional deviations.
Results: Models of group I showed lower positional deviation compared to other groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the 3 impression techniques regarding positional accuracy of the implants.
Conclusion: 3D printed splint method can be used as an alternative to conventional splinting techniques.
Keywords: Multiimplant impression; Splinting technique; 3D printed splint.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Alexandria Dental Journal
Volume 48, Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
December 2023
Pages 138-142

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics