Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Elkersh, N., Talaab, M., Ahmed, W., Gaweesh, Y. (2019). UTILITY OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE MANDIBLE IN DETECTION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN. Alexandria Dental Journal, 44(2), 9-14. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57355
Noha M. Elkersh; Maha R. Talaab; Walid M. Ahmed; Yousria S. Gaweesh. "UTILITY OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE MANDIBLE IN DETECTION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN". Alexandria Dental Journal, 44, 2, 2019, 9-14. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57355
Elkersh, N., Talaab, M., Ahmed, W., Gaweesh, Y. (2019). 'UTILITY OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE MANDIBLE IN DETECTION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN', Alexandria Dental Journal, 44(2), pp. 9-14. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57355
Elkersh, N., Talaab, M., Ahmed, W., Gaweesh, Y. UTILITY OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE MANDIBLE IN DETECTION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2019; 44(2): 9-14. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57355

UTILITY OF CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE MANDIBLE IN DETECTION OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN

Article 2, Volume 44, Issue 2, August 2019, Page 9-14  XML PDF (236.21 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57355
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Noha M. Elkersh email 1; Maha R. Talaab2; Walid M. Ahmed3; Yousria S. Gaweesh4
1Instructor at Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Lecturer of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
3Lecturer of Radio diagnosis, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University
4Professor of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by decreased bone mass and increased bone fragility. Dental radiographs
are widely used in the adult population especially Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) that is used in oral and maxillofacial surgery
for numerous clinical applications. Therefore, dental radiographs may offer an opportunity as a screening tool for the early detection of
osteoporosis and subsequent referral.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of mandibular CBCT images for the detection of osteoporosis
in postmenopausal women and to correlate it to Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: twenty four postmenopausal female patients were recruited in this study. Based on their DEXA results,
they were classified into osteoporotic and control non-osteoporotic groups. CBCT examination was done as part of surgical treatment. Coronal
images were used to measure the computed tomography mandibular index (CTMI) and the computed tomography index (superior) (CTIS).The
correlation between these indices and bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DEXA were assessed.
RESULTS: There were significant differences between the control and osteoporotic groups in the computed tomography mandibular index
superior CTI(S), and computed tomography mental index (CTMI: inferior cortical width).There was significant positive correlation between
CTMI and T-score measured by DEXA.
CONCLUSIONS: CTI(S) and CTMI on the CBCT images can be used to assess the osteoporotic women.

Keywords
KEYWORDS: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; bone density; Osteoporosis
Main Subjects
Oral medicine; Oral radiology; Periodontology
References
  1. For the dental patient. Osteoporosis medications and the risk of developing jaw complications. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:692.
  2. Koh K-J, Kim K-A. Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011;41:101-6.
  3. Amam A, Rustom J. Assessment of mandibular alveolar bone density in osteoporotic adults in Syria. OJDOM. 2014;2:26-32.
  4. Mostafa RA, Arnout EA, Abo el-Fotouh MM. Feasibility of cone beam computed tomography radiomorphometric analysis and fractal dimension in assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in correlation with dual X-ray absorptiometry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45:20160212.
  5. Kazakia GJ, Majumdar S. New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006;7:67-74.
  6. Knapp KM, Blake GM, Spector TD, Fogelman I. Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound? Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:367-74.
  7. Parlani S, Nair P, Agrawal S, Chitumalla R, Beohar G. Role of Panoramic Radiographs in the Detection of Osteoporosis. Oral Hyg Health. 2014;2:2332-0702.1000121.
  8. Marcus R, Majumder S. Osteoporosis. 2nd ed. Burlington: Academic Press; 2001. p 3.
  9. Mohammed AR, Abbas FK, Hassan NA. Diagnostic efficacy of mandibular cortical thickness on panoramic radiographs to identify postmenopausal women with low bone mineral densities (Iraqi Population). J Am Sci. 2013;9:308-12.
  10. Yashoda Devi B, Rakesh N, Ravleen N. Diagnostic efficacy of panoramic mandibular index to identify postmenopausal women with low bone mineral densities. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3:456-61.
  11. Koh K-J, Kim K-A. Utility of the computed tomography indices on cone beam computed tomography images in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in women. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011;41:101-6.
  12. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Heiskanen P, Vainio P, Lassila V. Panoramic mandibular index and bone mineral densities in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75:774-9.
  13. Taguchi A, Tsuda M, Ohtsuka M, Kodama I, Sanada M, Nakamoto T, et al. Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:387-94.
  14. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:609-25.
  15. White SC, Rudolph DJ. Alterations of the trabecular pattern of the jaws in patients with osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88:628-35.
  16. Biostatistics DW. A foundation for analysis in the health science. 6th ed. NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1995.
  17. Barngkgei I, Al Haffar I, Khattab R. Osteoporosis prediction from the mandible using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:263-71.
  18. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H, Worthington H. Radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in a British female population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:173- 81.
  19. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.1991;71:349-56.
  20. Delaney MF. Strategies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis during early postmenopause. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:S12-S23.
  21. Gomes C, de Rezende Barbosa G, Bello R, Bóscolo F, de Almeida S. A comparison of the mandibular index on panoramic and cross-sectional images from CBCT exams from osteoporosis risk group. Osteoporosis Int. 2014;25:1885-90.
  22. Barngkgei I, Al Haffar I, Khattab R. Osteoporosis prediction from the mandible using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:263-71.
  23. Melescanu-Imre M, Preoteasa E. Mandibular panoramic indexes predictors of skeletal osteoporosis for implant therapy. Curr Health Sci J. 2009;35:220-5.
  24. Leite AF, de Souza Figueiredo PT, Guia CM, Melo NS, de Paula AP. Correlations between seven panoramic radiomorphometric indices and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:449-56.
  25. Vlasiadis KZ, Skouteris CA, Velegrakis GA, Fragouli I, Neratzoulakis JM, Damilakis J, et al. Mandibular radiomorphometric measurements as indicators of possible osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2007;58:226-35.
  26. Kim OS, Shin MH, Song IH, Lim IG, Yoon SJ, Kim OJ, et al. Digital panoramic radiographs are useful for diagnosis of osteoporosis in Korean postmenopausal women. Gerodontology. 2016;33:185-92.
  27. Brasileiro C, Chalub L, Abreu M, Barreiros I, Amaral T, Kakehasi A, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:26.
  28. Güngör E, Yildirim D, Çevik R. Evaluation of osteoporosis in jaw bones using cone beam CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Oral Sci. 2016;58:185-94.
  29. Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, Glüer CC, Grampp S, Harris ST, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:707-30.
  30. Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, et al. Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA. 2001;286:2815-22.
  31. Hamdy RC, Petak SM, Lenchik L. Which central dual Xray absorptiometry skeletal sites and regions of interest should be used to determine the diagnosis of osteoporosis? J Clin Densitom. 2002;5:s11-s7.
  32. Woodson G. Dual X-ray absorptiometry T-score concordance and discordance between hip and spine measurement sites. J Clin Densitom. 2000;3:319-24.
  33. Singh SV, Aggarwal H, Gupta V, Kumar P, Tripathi A. Measurements in mandibular pantomographic X-rays and relation to skeletal mineral densitometric values. J Clin Densitom. 2016;19:255-61.
  34. Passos JS, Gomes Filho IS, Sarmento VA, Sampaio DS, Gonçalves FP, Coelho JMF, et al. Women with low bone mineral density and dental panoramic radiography. Menopause. 2012;19:704-9.
  35. Damilakis J, Vlasiadis K. Have panoramic indices the power to identify women with low BMD at the axial skeleton? Phys Med. 2011;27:39-43.
Statistics
Article View: 212
PDF Download: 809