EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF NANOPARTICLES GLASS CARBOMER AND HIGH VISCOSITY GLASS IONOMER IN PRIMARY TEETH DENTIN (IN VITRO STUDY)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Bachelor of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

2 - Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

3 - Associate Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

4 Professor of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Different techniques can be utilized in vitro to evaluate the durability of the bond strength to tooth structure. Shear bond strength test is one of these methods which have been widely used. Glass carbomer has been introduced with claims of improved physical characteristics in comparison with conventional GICs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the shear bond strength of glass carbomer to primary dentin versus a high viscosity glass ionomer (Fuji IX GP) MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty primary molar teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes or exfoliated by normal shedding were collected according to specific criteria from public hospitals in Alexandria and outpatient clinic of the Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. Crown surfaces of the included teeth were mounted in acrylic blocks then, ground with water-cooled silicon carbide abrasive papers successively to obtain flat dentin surfaces. The prepared specimens (n=20) were divided into two groups according to the glass ionomer cement (GIC) bonded to the dentin surface (10/ each group): group I (Fuji IX GP) and group II (Glass Carbomer). Shear bond strength (SBS) between dentin surface and the bonded material was measured using a universal testing machine. RESULTS: The results revealed that, Fuji IXGP group recorded the highest mean SBS value (6.624) while, Glass Carbomer recorded mean value (2.870). There was a highly significant difference in shear bond strength values between both groups (p= 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The high viscosity glass ionomer was higher in shear bond strength than glass carbomer glass ionomer and this finding may be salutary in GICs selection by dental practitioners.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Powis D, Follerås T, Merson S, Wilson A. Materials Science Improved Adhesion of a Glass Ionomer Cement to Dentin and Enamel. J Dent Res. 1982; 61: 1416-22.
  2. Yap A, Tan A, Goh A, Goh D, Chin K. Effect of surface treatment and cement maturation on the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomers to dentin. Oper Dent. 2002; 28: 728-33.
  3. Triana R, Prado C, Garro J, Garcia-Godoy F. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent. 1994; 7: 252-4.
  4. Safar J, Davis R, Overton J. Effect of saliva contamination on the bond of dentin to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Oper Dent. 1998; 24: 351-7.
  5. Davidson CL, Mjör IA. Advances in glass-ionomer cements, Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 1999.
  6. Albers H. Tooth-colored Restoratives. Santa Rosa. CA: Alto books; 1996.
  7. Mount GJ, Hume WR. Preservation and restoration of tooth structure, London: Mosby Limited; 1998.
  8. Nicholson JW. Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review. Biomaterials. 1998; 19: 485-94.
  9. Sidhu S. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject? Aust Dent J. 2011; 56: 23-30.
  10. Williams J, Billington R, Pearson G. The comparative strengths of commercial glass-ionomer cements with and without metal additions. Br Dent J. 1992; 172: 279-82.
  11. Holst A. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Ketac-Silver restorations in primary molars. Swed Dent J. 1995; 20: 209-14.
  12. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan K. New trends in glassionomer chemistry. Biomaterials. 1998; 19: 479-83.
  13. Saito S, Tosaki S, Hirota K. Characteristics of glassionomer cements. Advances in glassionomer cements, Chicago: Quintessence; 1999. pp 15-50.
  14. Bonifácio C, Kleverlaan C, Raggio D, Werner A, De Carvalho R, Van Amerongen W. Physical‐mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust Dent J. 2009; 54: 233-7.
  15. Rastelli AN, Jacomassi DP, Faloni APS, Queiroz TP, Rojas SS, Bernardi MIB, et al. The filler content of the dental composite resins and their influence on different properties. Microsc Res Tech. 2012; 75: 758-65.
  16. Olegário IC, Malagrana APVFP, Kim SSH, Hesse D, Tedesco TK, Calvo AFB, et al. Mechanical properties of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and nanoparticle glass carbomer. J Nanomater. 2015; 2015: 37.
  17. Lucas ME, Arita K, Nishino M. Toughness, bonding and fluoride-release properties of hydroxyapatite-added glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 3787-94.
  18. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Moshaverinia M, Roohpour N, Darr JA, Rehman I. Effects of incorporation of hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite nanobioceramics into conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC). Acta Biomater. 2008; 4: 432-40.
  19. Koenraads H, Van der Kroon G, Frencken J. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 551- 6.
  20. Braem MJ, Lambrechts P, Gladys S, Vanherle G. In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. Dent Mater. 1995; 11: 137-41.
  21. Knight G, McIntyre J. The effect of silver fluoride and potassium iodide on the bond strength of auto cure glass ionomer cement to dentine. Aust Dent J. 2006; 51: 42-5.
  22. Wilson A, Prosser H, Powis D. Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 1983; 62: 590-2.
  23. Fowler C, Swartz M, Moore B, Rhodes B. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater. 1992; 8: 265-9.
  24. Swift Jr EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26: 95-110.
  25. Dennison JB. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1997; 19: 246-52.
  26. Suresh K, Nagarathna J. Evaluation of shear bond strengths of fuji II and fuji IX with and without salivary contamination on deciduous molars-an In vitro study. AOSR. 2011; 1: 139-45.
  27. Shebl E, Etman W, Genaid TM, Shalaby M. Durability of bond strength of glass-ionomers to enamel. Tanta Dental Journal. 2015;12(1):16-27.
  28. Murthy SS, Murthy GS. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Glass Ionomer Cements in Primary Teeth. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:103.
  29. Konno ANK, Sinhoreti MAC, Consani S, Sobrinho LC, Consani RLX. Storage effect on the shear bond strength of adhesive systems. Braz Dent J. 2003;14:42-7.
  30. Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay F, Svizero N, Sano H, Kaga M, et al. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. J Dent Res. 2004;83:843-8.
  31. Konno ANK, Sinhoreti MAC, Consani S, Sobrinho LC, Consani RLX. Storage effect on the shear bond strength of adhesive systems. Braz Dent J. 2003;14:42-7.
  32. Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay F, Svizero N, Sano H, Kaga M, et al. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. J Dent Res. 2004;83:843-8.
  33. Crisp S, Ferner A, Lewis B, Wilson A. Properties of improved glass-ionomer cement formulations. J Dent. 1975; 3: 125-30.
  34. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. ed n, editor. London, California, New Delhi: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006.
  35. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84: 118-32.
  36. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent. 2001; 26: 119-44.
  37. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res. 2000;79:709-14.
  38. Carvalho T-S, van Amerongen W-E, de Gee A, Bönecker M, Sampaio F-C. Shear bond strengths of three glass ionomer cements to enamel and dentine. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e406-10.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics