Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Mustafa, M., Khalil, A., Melek, L. (2017). EVALUATION OF PIEZOTOMED ALVEOLAR RIDGE SPLITTING WITH STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE FOR IMPLANT PLACEMENT. Alexandria Dental Journal, 42(1), 113-118. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57872
Mohamed N. Mustafa; Abdelaziz F. Khalil; Lydia N. Melek. "EVALUATION OF PIEZOTOMED ALVEOLAR RIDGE SPLITTING WITH STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE FOR IMPLANT PLACEMENT". Alexandria Dental Journal, 42, 1, 2017, 113-118. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57872
Mustafa, M., Khalil, A., Melek, L. (2017). 'EVALUATION OF PIEZOTOMED ALVEOLAR RIDGE SPLITTING WITH STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE FOR IMPLANT PLACEMENT', Alexandria Dental Journal, 42(1), pp. 113-118. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57872
Mustafa, M., Khalil, A., Melek, L. EVALUATION OF PIEZOTOMED ALVEOLAR RIDGE SPLITTING WITH STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE FOR IMPLANT PLACEMENT. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2017; 42(1): 113-118. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57872

EVALUATION OF PIEZOTOMED ALVEOLAR RIDGE SPLITTING WITH STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE FOR IMPLANT PLACEMENT

Article 19, Volume 42, Issue 1, April 2017, Page 113-118  XML PDF (863.63 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57872
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed N. Mustafa* 1; Abdelaziz F. Khalil2; Lydia N. Melek3
1Dentist at Ras el Teen Hospital Ministry of Health, Alexandria, Egypt.
2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
3Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Narrow dentoalveolar ridges remain a serious challenge for the successful placement of endosseous implants. Several techniques for this procedure may be considered, such as guided bone regeneration, bone block grafting, and ridge splitting for bone expansion. The ridge split procedure provides a quicker and a more reliable method. Advances in technology, Stereolithography allow fabrication of surgical guide from 3D generated models for precise implant placement. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of minimally invasive ridge splitting procedure aided with surgical guide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical study was performed on a total of 7 patients with mandibular free end saddle. The sample was selected conveniently to fulfill a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then the selected participants performed ridge splitting with the aid of surgical guide. After ridge splitting, all patients had simultaneous implant placement followed by clinical and radiographical evaluation over a period of 6 months. RESULTS: Merging the preoperative, immediate and 6 months postoperative CBCT images showed statistically significant values of accuracy and increase in bone width. CONCLUSIONS: Alveoalar ridge splitting with the aid of stereolithographic surgical stent is a well acceptable technique for implant placement.
Keywords
ridge splitting; stereolithographic surgical stent; Flapless; Implants
Main Subjects
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
References
1. Scipioni A, Bruschi GB, Calesini G. The edentulous ridge expansion technique: a five-year study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994; 14:451-9. 

2. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17:136-59. 
3. Laster Z, Reem Y, Nagler R. Horizontal alveolar ridge distraction in an edentulous patient. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69:502-6. 
4. Castillo R. Horizontal ridge augmentation before placing implants using a double-bone, double resorbable membrane technique: Two clinical cases. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010; 5:340-56. 
5. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22:49-70. 
6. Suh JJ, Shelemay A, Choi SH, Chai JK. Alveolar ridge splitting: A new microsaw technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25:165-71. 
7. Vercellotti T. Piezoelectric surgery in implantology: A case report-A new piezoelectric ridge expansion technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 20:358-65. 
8. Mellonig JT, Nevins M. Guided bone regeneration of bone defects associated with implants: An evidence-based outcome assessment. Int J Periodontics Restorative. Dent 1995; 15:168-85. 
9. Malo P, de AraujoNobre M, Lopes A. The use of computer guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(6):S26-34. 
10. Friedman AM, Slabbert JCG,Devilliers H. Mandibular alveolar bone resorption: A vertical assessment. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 722-5. 
11. Kotz SBN, Read CB, Vidakovic B. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. N.J.: Wiley-Interscience. 2006; 33-59. 
12. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol. 2005; 76:503-7. 
13. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24:234-42. 
14. Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. Splitmouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28:563-72. 
15. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computerguided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:73-86. 
16. D'Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computerdesigned stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14:321-35. 
17.Block MS, Chandler C. Computed tomography-guided surgery: complications associated with scanning, processing, surgery, and prosthetics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:13-22. 
18. Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Lingohr T, Rothamel D, Mischkowski RA, et al. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:1191-9. 
19. Viegas VN, Dutra V, Pagnoncelli RM, de Oliveira MG. Transference of virtual planning and planning over biomedical prototypes for dental implant placement using guided surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21:290-5. 
20. Meloni SM, De Riu G, Pisano M, Cattina G, Tullio A. Implant treatment software planning and guided flapless surgery with immediate provisional prosthesis delivery in the fully edentulous maxilla. A retrospective analysis of 15 consecutively treated patients. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010; 3:245-51. 
21. Yu JJ, Kim GT, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Paek J, Kim SH, et al. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomography-guided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82:275-83. 
22.Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli LV, Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 42:264-75. 
23.Bruno V, Badino M, Riccitiello F, Spagnuolo G, Amato M. Computer Guided Implantology Accuracy and Complications. Case Rep Dent. 2013; 54:70-42. 
24. Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Marchetti M, Scarfo B, Esposito M. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental 97 implants: 1- year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014; 7:229-42. 
25. Laleman I, Bernard L, Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM, Quirynen M. Guided Implant Surgery in the Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31: s103-17. 
26.Reyes A, Turkyilmaz I, Prihoda TJ. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113:295-303. 
27. Ewers R, Schicho K, Truppe M, Seemann R, Reichwein A, Figl M, et al. Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62:329-34. 
28. Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, Wanschitz F, Truppe M, Seemann R, et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34:1-8. 
29. Guillemant H, Mouigha A, Vienne A, Libersa JC, Ferri J. Contribution and limitations of MIS(R) screwed expanders in the jaws: illustration from clinical cases and comparison of the osseous volume from three-dimensional radiographic pictures. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2012; 113:448-54. 
30. Wadhwa B, Jain V, Bhutia O, Bhalla AS, Pruthi G. Flapless versus open flap techniques of implant placement: A 15- month follow-up study. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26:372-7. 
31. Widmann G, Bale JR. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery Va review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:305-13. 
32.Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L.Minimally invasive flapless surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:21-7. 
Statistics
Article View: 185
PDF Download: 599