Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Owida, N., Wahba, N., Talaat, D., Elmallakh, B. (2018). LABORATORY EVALUATION OF A SELF-ADHERING FLOWABLE COMPOSITE RESIN AS A PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT. Alexandria Dental Journal, 43(3), 88-93. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.58004
Nour M. Owida; Nadia A. Wahba; Dalia M. Talaat; Bassem F. Elmallakh. "LABORATORY EVALUATION OF A SELF-ADHERING FLOWABLE COMPOSITE RESIN AS A PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT". Alexandria Dental Journal, 43, 3, 2018, 88-93. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.58004
Owida, N., Wahba, N., Talaat, D., Elmallakh, B. (2018). 'LABORATORY EVALUATION OF A SELF-ADHERING FLOWABLE COMPOSITE RESIN AS A PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT', Alexandria Dental Journal, 43(3), pp. 88-93. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.58004
Owida, N., Wahba, N., Talaat, D., Elmallakh, B. LABORATORY EVALUATION OF A SELF-ADHERING FLOWABLE COMPOSITE RESIN AS A PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2018; 43(3): 88-93. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.58004

LABORATORY EVALUATION OF A SELF-ADHERING FLOWABLE COMPOSITE RESIN AS A PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT

Article 15, Volume 43, Issue 3, December 2018, Page 88-93  XML PDF (173.79 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.58004
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Nour M. Owida1; Nadia A. Wahba2; Dalia M. Talaat3; Bassem F. Elmallakh4
1Bachelor of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
3Associate Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
4Professor of Dental Biomaterials department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The success of pit and fissure sealant is highly dependent on obtaining and maintaining an intimate adaptation to the tooth surface. Self-adherable flowable composite (Vertise Flow) represents a new generation of dental materials that combines the properties of flowable composites and self-adhesives. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Vertise Flow (VF) in term of shear bond strength and sealing ability to enamel of pit and fissure in comparison to conventional sealant with self-adhesive (Clinpro sealant/ Adper Prompt L pop) MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty extracted sound premolars were selected. These were randomly divided into two groups according to the material used. Group I for Veritse Flow and Group II for Clinpro Sealant. Each group was further divided equally into two sub groups (n=15). GroupI was divided into Ia and Ib to test shear bond strength and microleakage respectively. Group II was divided into IIa and IIb to test shear bond strength and microleakage respectively. Shear bond strength test: Group Ia buccal surface was treated with phosphoric acid and VF. Group IIa was treated with Clinpro sealant and Adper Prompt L Pop. Shear bond strength was measured using universal testing machine. Mode of failure of each specimen was determined using stereomicroscope. Microleakage test: Group Ib, teeth pit and fissures were acid etched and sealed with VF. Group IIb, Adper Prompt L Pop was applied and teeth were sealed with Clinpro sealant. Teeth were thermocycled, stained, sectioned and examined under stereomicroscope. Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Group I (VF) showed significantly higher shear bond strength and lower microleakage score than Group II (Clinpro sealant/PLP) (p < 0.05). adhesive mode of failure was the predominant mode in group IIa with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Vertise Flow shows encouraging results to be used as a pit and fissure sealant
Keywords
sealant; self-adherable composite; Vertise flow; Shear bond strength; Microleakage
References
  1. 1. Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24: 393-414.
  2. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J. 2000; 50: 1-12.
  3. Simonsen RJ. Chapter 2: Pit and fissure sealants. In: Clinical Applications of the Acid Etch Technique. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 1978:19-42.
  4. Siegal MD. Workshop on guidelines for sealant use. J Publ Health Dent. 1995; 55: 259-311.
  5. Coronal SAM, Borsatto MC, Garcia L, Ramos RP, PalmaDibb RG. Randomized controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one year follow up. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005; 15: 44-50.
  6. Pérez LL, Cortés LO, García BC, Cózar HA. Marginal microleakage of the fissure sealants: a comparative study. J Dent Child. 2003; 70: 24-8.
  7. Feigal RJ, Quelhas I. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 249-51.
  8. Beauchamp J, Caufield W, James J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, Donly K, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants a report of the American Dental Association Council on scientific affairs. JADA. 2008; 139: 257-68.
  9. Tavassoli SH, Mehran M, Noori ET, Hedeshi RM. Effect of Self-Etching and Single-Bottle Bonding Systems on Shear Bond Strength of Fissure sealant to Primary and Permanent Enamel. JIDAI. 2014; 26: 6-12.
  10. Mascarenhas AK., Nazar H., Al-Mutawaa S, Soparkar P. Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention. Pediatr Dent. 2008; 30: 25-8.
  11. Papacchini F, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Garcia GF, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength to ground enamel by glass-ionomers, resin-modified glass-ionomers, and resin composites used as pit and fissure sealants. J Dent. 2005; 33: 459-67.
  12. Margvelashvili M, Vichi A, Carrabba M, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Bond Strength to Unground Enamel and Sealing Ability in Pits and Fissures of a New Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013; 37: 397-402.
  13. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Clinical study of the self-adhering flowable composite resin Vertise Flow in Class I restorations: sixmonth follow-up. Int Dent SA. 2010; 12: 14-23.
  14. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of a self-adhesive and four novel flowable composites: J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15: 229- 36.
  15. Alsaleh MM. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of flowable composite as pit and fissure sealing material used on permanent molars. MD thesis. Alexandria University Egypt. 2009.
  16. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 895-910.
  17. Eliades A, Birpou E, Eliades T, Eliades G. Self-adhesive restorations as pit and fissure sealants: A comparative laboratory study. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:752-62.
  18. Sharaf A. The use of a self-etching adhesive in the application of pit and fissure sealant: an in vivo and in vitro study. Egy Dent J. 2003; 49: 1319-26.
  19. Juloski J, Goracci C, Rengo C, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, Vulicevic ZR, et al. Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching. Am J Dent. 2012; 25: 239-43.
  20. Pardi V, Sinhoreti MA, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim Mde C. In Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants. Braz Dent J. 2006; 17: 49-52.
  21. Yavuz I, Aydin AH, Ulku R, Dulgergil TC, Akdag MZ. New technique: Measurement of microleakage volume in the marginal gaps of the dental restorations. Biotechnol Biotech Equip. 2005; 19: 184-91.
  22. Ovrebo RC, Raadal M. Microleakage in fissures sealed with resin or glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res. 1990; 98: 66-9.
  23. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM; 2012.
  24. Garcia N, Morelli E, Silva D, Giongo M, Pollheim P, Largura S, et al. Bonding performance of a self-adhering flowable composite to substrates used in direct technique. RSBO. 2013; 10: 143-9.
  25. Gonulol N, Ertas E, Yilmaz A, Cankaya S. Effect of thermal aging on microleakage of current flowable composite resins. JDS. 2014; 3: 1-7.
  26. Pipatphatsakorn M. Microtensile bond strength of new selfadhesive flowable resin composite, Vertise® Flow™, on Different Enamel Substrates. CU Dent J. 2015; 38: 83-96.
  27. Technical Bulletin/Vertise Flow Self Adhering Flowable Composite.Orange, CA, USA: Kerr Sybron Dental Specialties, 2010.
  28. Ernst CP. Positioning self-etching adhesives: versus or in addition to phosphoric acid etching. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004; 16: 57-69.
  29. Erhardt MC, Cavalcante L, Assad M, Pimenta LA. Influence of Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment on Self-Etching Bond Strengths. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004; 16: 33-40.
  30. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118-32.
  31. Derelioglu SS, Yilmaz Y, Celik P, Carikcioglu B, Keles S. Bond strength and microleakage of self-adhesive and conventional fissure sealants. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33: 530- 8.
  32. Raskin A, Tassery H, D’hoore W, Gonthier S, Vreven J, Degrange M, et al. Influence of the number of specimens on the reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. Am J Dent. 2003; 6: 207-10.
  33. International Organization for Standardization. Dental Materials-Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO/TS 11405; 2015.
  34. Wei J, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts C. Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 259-66.
  35. Guelmann M, Bonnini S, Primosch RE, Soderholm KJ. Microleakage and wall adaptation of conservative restorations. Am J Dent. 2002; 15: 407-11.
  36. ElMotyam K, Walid A, Youssef R. Assessment and comparison of nanoleakage and resin tag length of three different pit and fissure sealants: An In-vitro scanning electron microscope study. J Am Sci. 2013; 9: 329-37.
Statistics
Article View: 286
PDF Download: 729