CLINICAL EVALUATION OF OSCILLATION METHOD FOR APPLICATION OF A PACKABLE COMPOSITE RESIN

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Lecture of Operative Dentistry, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

2 Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

3 Professor of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite all improvements in dental composites, marginal microleakage is one of the most common causes of resincomposite restoration failure. In order to address this concern, efforts have been focusing on dealing with different aspects of composite consistency, polymerization stresses and packing techniques. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work is to clinically evaluate the effect of two oscillating packing instruments (ET3000 & Compothixo) on improving the outcome and the longevity of Quixfil dental packable composite in the everyday practice of general practitioners without the need for placing flowable composite underneath it. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients were selected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to participate in this study. Each patient received three posterior class II cavities preparations. The cavities were divided into three groups (n=20 each) according to the method of composite packing. Test Group I: Quixfil packable composite packed with ET3000, Test Group II: Quixfil packable composite packed with Compothixo & Group III (Control): incremental placement of Quixfll composite. The twenty patients were followed up for one and a half years according to modified RYGE Criteria. All the data obtained were then statistically analyzed using Friedman test at significance level 5% (P< 0.05). RESULTS: All restorations evaluated in this study demonstrated acceptable clinical performance within the evaluation period based on the Alfa and Bravo ratings for clinically satisfactory restorations. Statistical analysis detected no significant differences between the packing techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Good clinical results can be achieved with oscillation packing techniques when using QuiXfil packable posterior composite.

Keywords

References

  1. Santhosh L, Bashetty K, Nadig G. The influence of different composite placement techniques on microleakage in preparations with high C-factor: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2008; 11: 112-6.
  2. Lyons K. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options. N Z Dent J. 2003; 99: 10-5.
  3. Ayub KV, Santos GC Jr, Rizkalla AS, Bohay R, Pegoraro LF, Rubo JH, et al. Effect of preheating on microhardness and viscosity of 4 resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2014; 80: e12.
  4. Kapoor N, Bahuguna N, Anand S. Influence of composite insertion technique on gap formation. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19: 77-81.
  5. Yeolekar TS, Chowdhary NR, Mukunda KS, Kiran NK. Evaluation of microleakage and marginal ridge fracture resistance of primary molars restored with three restorative materials: A comparative in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015; 8: 108-13.
  6. Chi HH. A Posterior Composite Case Utilizing the Incremental and Stratified Layering Technique. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 512-6.
  7. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferrecane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resincomposites: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 962- 70.
  8. Papadogiannis Y, Lakes RS, Palaghias G, HelvatjogluAntoniades M, Papadogiannisc D. Fatigue of packable dental composites. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 235-42.
  9. AL-Azzawi HJ, AL-Hyali NA, Al-Dabbagh FJM. Microleakage of class II packable resin composite lined with flowable composite and resin modified glass 6 ionomer cement: An in vitro study. JBCD. 2102; 24: 6-10.
  10. Her SC, Lin CS. Vibration analysis of composite laminate excited by piezoelectric actuators. Sensors (Basel). 2013; 13: 2997-3013.
  11. Trujillo M, Newman SM, Stansbury JW. Use of near-IR to monitor the influence of external heating on dental composite photo polymerization. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 766-77.
  12. Ozcan M, Mese A. Effect of Ultrasonic Versus Manual Cementation on the Fracture Strength of Resin Composite Laminates. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 437-42.
  13. Puckett AD, Fitchie JG, Kirk PC, Gamblin J. Direct composite restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 659-75.
  14. Didem A, Gözde Y, Nurhan Ö. Comparative Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Resins. Open J Compos Mater 2014; 4: 117-21.
  15. Palaniappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M. Threeyear randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations. Clin Oral Invest. 2010; 14: 441-58.
  16. Celik C, Arhun N, Yamanel K. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: 12- month results. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4: 57-65.
  17. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, Mjör IA. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J. 1981; 5: 235-9.
  18. Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res. 2011; 90: 953-68.
  19. Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results. Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 397-404.
  20. Dos Santos GB, Monte Alto RV, Sampaio Filho HR, Da Silva EM, Fellows CE. Light transmission on dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008; 24: 571-6.
  21. Lee YK. Influence of filler on the difference between the transmitted and reflect colors of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008; 24: 1243-7.
  22. Lim YK, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Influence of filler distribution on the color parameters of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008; 24: 67- 73.
  23. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials. 2003; 24:655-65.
  24. Sideridou ID, Achilias DS. Elution study of unreacted BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 74: 617-26.
  25. Celik C, Arhun N, Yamanel K. Clinical evaluation of resinbased composites in posterior restorations: a 3-year study. Med Princ Pract. 2014; 23: 453-9.
  26. Muhamad AH, Azzaldeen A, Abdulgani M. Esthetics of Class IV Restorations with Composite Resins. J Dent Med Sci. 2016; 15: 61-6.
  27. Iovan G, Stoleriu S, Moldovanu A, Morogai S, Andrian S. SEM study of the interface between the cavity wall and composite resin in cavities filled using vibration. IJMD. 2011; 1: 254-8.
  28. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4- year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Adhes Dent. 2010; 12: 237-43.
  29. Jain V, Mathur VP, Pillai RS, Kalra S. A preliminary study to find out maximum occlusal bite force in Indian individuals. Indian J Dent Res. 2014; 25: 325-30.
  30. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012; 28: 72-86.
  31. Bohaty BS, Ye Q, Misra A, Sene F, Spencer P. Posterior composite restoration update: focus influencing form and function. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013; 5: 33-42.
  32. Opdam NJM, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, et al. Longevity of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014; 93: 943-9.
  33. Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Cefaly DF, Jorge MF, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2006; 10: 197-203.
  34. Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, Bitriol B, Dumitrescu N, Bauer P, et al. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A metaanalysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater. 2015; 31: 958- 85.
Alexandria Dental Journal
Volume 43, Issue 3
December 2018
Pages 109-115

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics