THE USE OF CALCIUM ION NANOSTRUCTURE IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR MISSING MAXILLARY ANTERIOR TEETH

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 BDS, MS, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

2 Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The goal of modern dentistry is to restore the patient to normal contour, function, comfort, esthetics, speech and health regardless of the atrophy, disease or injury of the stomatognathic system. Dental implant is defined as a prosthetic device alloplastic material implanted into the oral tissues beneath the mucosal or periosteal layer within the bone to provide retention and support for a fixed or removable prosthesis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the use of calcium ion surface treated nanostructure implant system for missing maxillary anterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with anterior maxillary missing tooth were treated with calcium ion nanostructure implant. An implant stability and assessment of the osseointegration progress evaluation was conducted using the resonance frequency analysis technique (Osstell) immediately after implant placement and after one and half month at the loading time. Also, radiographic investigations were performed after one and half and three months to estimate the peri-implant mean bone density. RESULTS: all of the cases showed an uneventful wound healing. Mean bone density after three months showed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase in its values when compared to the immediately postoperative values. Implant stability showed statistical significant difference detected clinically by Osstell. CONCLUSIONS: The calcium ion nanostructure implant system showed an adequate clinical and radiographic performance in the replacement of missing maxillary anterior teeth with and early loading protocol.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Longterm follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347-59.
  2. Adell R Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentoulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387-416.
  3. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3:81-100.
  4. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155-70.
  5. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15- year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387-416.
  6. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:743-54.
  7. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:261-7.
  8. Zix J, Hugs, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:525-30.
  9. Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:598-604.
  10. Van der perre G, Lowet G. Vibration, sonic and ultrasonic wave propagation analysis for the detection of osteoporosis. Clin Rheumatol. 1994;13:45-5.
  11. Veltri M, Balleri P, Ferrari M. Influence of transducer orientation on Osstell stability measurements of osseointegrated implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9:60-4.
  12. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Aragão FJ, Cooper LF. Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3822- 35.
  13. Cheng M, Qiao Y, Wang Q, Jin G, Qin H, Zhao Y, et al. Calcium plasma implanted titanium surface with hierarchical microstructure for improving the bone formation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:13053-61.
  14. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172-84.
  15. Nayab SN, Jones FH, Olsen I. Effects of calcium ion implantation on human bone cell interaction with titanium. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4717-27.
  16. Ribeiro AR, Oliveira F, Boldrini LC, Leite PE, FalaganLotsch P, Linhares AB, et al. Micro-arc oxidation as a tool to develop multifunctional calcium-rich surfaces for dental implant applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;54:196-206.
  17. Huang Q, Liu X, Elkhooly TA, Zhang R, Shen Z, Feng Q. A novel titania/calcium silicate hydrate hierarchical coating on titanium. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;134:169-77.
  18. Li JY, Pow EHN, Zheng LW, Ma L, Kwong DLW, Cheung LK. Effects of calcium phosphate nanocrystals on osseointegration of titanium implant in irradiated bone. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:783894.
  19. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Lanford WA. Increased osteoblast adhesion on titanium-coated hydroxylapatite that forms CaTiO3. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2003;67:975-80.
  20. Conserva E, Consolo U. Biological cell activity and gene expression on implants with different macro/micro structured surfaces and chemical composition. Conference: Conference: Mega Gen European Scientific Meeting; 2013.
  21. Zhang W, Li Z, Liu Y, Ye D, Li J, Xu L, et al. Biofunctionalization of a titanium surface with a nanosawtooth structure regulates the behavior of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:4459-72.
  22. Lee SY, Yang DJ, Yeo S, An HW, Kim SJ, Choi WM, et al. Effect of XPEED® on Ti implants with deep threads. Key Eng Mater. 2012;493:442-6.
  23. Clementini M, Rossetti P, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Bonachela W, Canullo L. Systemic risk factors for periimplant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:323-34.
  24. Bolender CL. Indications and contraindications for different types of implant therapy. J Dent Educ. 1988;52:757-9.
  25. Dhanrajani PJ, Al-Rafee MA. Single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective study. Implant Dent. 2005;14:125-30.
  26. Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:460-9.
  27. Nebe JB, Muller L, Luthen F, Ewald A, Bergemann C, Conforto E, et al. Osteoblast response to biomimetically altered titanium surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1985- 95.
  28. Meredith N, Books K, Fribergs B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in viva. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:226-33.
  29. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:261-7.
  30. Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations postextraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73:73–83.
  31. Stanley M, Braga FC, Jordao BM. Immediate loading of single implants in the anterior maxilla: A 1-year prospective clinical study on 34 patients. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:8346496.
  32. Mangano FG, Mastrangelo P, Luongo F, Blay A, Tunchel S, Mangano C. Aesthetic outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets and healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a retrospective study on 103 patients with 3 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:272-82.
  33. Schouten C, Meijer GJ, van den Beucken JJJP, Spauwen PHM, Jansen JA. The quantitative assessment of periimplant bone responses using histomorphometry and micro-computed tomography. Biomaterials. 2009;30:4539–49.
  34. Xie C, Lu H, Li W, Chen F-M, Zhao Y-M. The use of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials in implant dentistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:853-62.
  35. Heller JG, Bradley T, Estes MS, Diop A. Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 1996;78:1315- 21.
  36. Cassetta M, Sofan AA, Altieri F, Barbato E. Evaluation of alveolar cortical bone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5:e245-52.
  37. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):55-77.
  38. Chasioti E, Sayed M, Drew H. Novel techniques with the aid of a staged CBCT guided surgical protocol. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:439706.
  39. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Topography Effects of Pure Titanium Substrates on Human Osteoblast Long-Term Adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:211-22.
  40. Nayab SN, Jones FH, Olsen I. Effects of Calcium IonImplantation of Titanium on Bone Cell Function in Vitro. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;83:296−302.
Alexandria Dental Journal
Volume 44, Issue 3
December 2019
Pages 8-14

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics