Abou Eleneen, H., Kotb, A., Bateman, C., Aly, T., Sweedan, O. (2021). EVALUATION OF THE USE OF BONE-BORNE CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES IN ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY CASES REQUIRING LE FORT I OSTEOTOMY. Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), 1-7. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.20512.1003
Haitham Abou Eleneen; Ahmed Rashad Kotb; Carlos Villegas Bateman; Tarek Mahmoud Aly; Ossama Abbas Sweedan. "EVALUATION OF THE USE OF BONE-BORNE CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES IN ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY CASES REQUIRING LE FORT I OSTEOTOMY". Alexandria Dental Journal, 46, 3, 2021, 1-7. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.20512.1003
Abou Eleneen, H., Kotb, A., Bateman, C., Aly, T., Sweedan, O. (2021). 'EVALUATION OF THE USE OF BONE-BORNE CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES IN ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY CASES REQUIRING LE FORT I OSTEOTOMY', Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), pp. 1-7. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.20512.1003
Abou Eleneen, H., Kotb, A., Bateman, C., Aly, T., Sweedan, O. EVALUATION OF THE USE OF BONE-BORNE CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES IN ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY CASES REQUIRING LE FORT I OSTEOTOMY. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2021; 46(3): 1-7. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.20512.1003
EVALUATION OF THE USE OF BONE-BORNE CAD/CAM SURGICAL GUIDES IN ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY CASES REQUIRING LE FORT I OSTEOTOMY
1Oral and Maxillofacial surgery department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
2Department of Orthodontics, CES university, Medellin, Colombia
Abstract
Background: Dentofacial deformities have many negative consequences in the form and function of head and neck region. It is estimated that in about 19% of orthodontic patients, orthognathic surgery is required along with the orthodontic procedure. The introduction of CAD/CAM technology in orthognathic surgery planning has facilitated the procedure and allowed for more predicted results. Aim of this study: The aim of the present study is to propose a new design of the intermediate stent that relates the mobilized maxilla to a fixed anatomical landmark in the skull which would allow for more accurate positioning of the maxilla during orthognathic surgery. Materials and methods: This study was conducted on sixteen patients who have been undergone Le Fort I osteotomy procedure. Eight of them were treated via a conventional stent while the other eight patients via a CAD/CAM bone-borne stent. Postoperative patient evaluation was performed by comparing the predicted and actual position postoperatively. This was done via 3D reconstruction CT scans. Results: Sixteen patients were recruited for the study (n=16), 5 males and 11 females, and were randomly allocated into two groups. Age ranged from 16 to 42 years with a mean of 24.31 ± 7.49. Pain evaluated by VAS was also found statistically insignificant between both groups using Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). Error of superimposition was found to be statistically significant between control group (0.317±0.22) and study group (0.870±0.23) using independent samples t-test (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The new intermediate splint design needs further modifications and refinement.
1. Posnick J. Orthognathic Surgery: Principles and Practice. In Elsevier Saunders; 2014. p. 441–74.
2. Reyneke JP. Essentials of Orthognathic Surgery. In: Second edi. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 2010. p. 357–442.
3. Aziz SR. Simon P. Hullihen and the origin of orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1303–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.044
4. Gartshore L. A brief account of the life of Rene Le Fort. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48:173–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.09.003
5. Yamamoto Y, Tanikawa C, Takada K. Wassmund osteotomy for excessive gingival display: a case report with three-dimensional facial evaluation. Aust Orthod J. 2014;30:81–8.
6. Wagner S, Reyneke JP. The Le Fort I downsliding osteotomy: a study of long-term hard tissue stability. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2000;15:37–49.
7. Bennett MA, Wolford LM. The maxillary step osteotomy and Steinmann pin stabilization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43:307–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(85)90297-6
8. Kaminishi RM, Davis WH, Hochwald DA, Nelson N. Improved maxillary stability with modified Lefort I technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983;41:203–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90084-8
9. Stringer DE, Boyne PJ. Modification of the maxillary step osteotomy and stabilization with titanium mesh. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:487–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(86)80019-2
10. Bays RA. Maxillary osteotomies utilizing the rigid adjustable pin (RAP) system: a review of 31 clinical cases. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1986;1:275–97.
11. Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen P, Waite P. Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In: Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen P, Waite P, editors. Third edit. PMPH-USA, Ltd; 2011. p. 1365–89.
12. Fonseca R. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In: Turvey T, Castello B, Ruiz R, editors. Third edit. Saunders; 2018. p. 44–61.
13. Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF. New clinical protocol to evaluate craniomaxillofacial deformity and plan surgical correction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2093–106. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.057
14. Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF. Three-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13:25–39. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2004.10.004
15. Gateno J, Xia J, Teichgraeber JF, Rosen A, Hultgren B, Vadnais T. The precision of computer-generated surgical splints. J oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:814–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00240-4
16. Hsu SS-P, Gateno J, Bell RB, Hirsch DL, Markiewicz MR, Teichgraeber JF, et al. Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:128–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027
17. Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF. A new paradigm for complex midface reconstruction: a reversed approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:693–703. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.08.024
18. Xia J, Ip HHS, Samman N, Wang D, Kot CSB, Yeung RWK, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;29:11–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0020.2000.290103.x
19. Sugawara J, Nagasaka H, Yamada S, Yokota S, Takahashi T, Nanda R. The application of orthodontic miniplates to Sendai surgery first. In: Seminars in Orthodontics. Elsevier; 2018. p. 17–36. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.01.003
20. Diaz PM, Garcia RG, Gias LN, Aguirre-Jaime A, Pérez JS, de la Plata MM, et al. Time used for orthodontic surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities in white patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:88–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.062
21. Dowling PA, Espeland L, Krogstad O, Stenvik A, Kelly A. Duration of orthodontic treatment involving orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999;14:146–52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70058-2
22. Luther F, Morris DO, Hart C. Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery: how long does it take and why? A retrospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;41:401–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00163-3
23. Kwon T-G, Han MD. Current status of surgery first approach (part II): precautions and complications. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;41:23. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0206-4
24. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Sailer HF, Zoller JE, Proffit WR, Fields HWJ, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:673–87. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.009
25. Mohlin B, Thilander B. The importance of the relationship between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction and some clinical applications in adults. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:192–204. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/6.3.192
26. Motegi E, Hatch JP, Rugh JD, Yamaguchi H. Health-related quality of life and psychosocial function 5 years after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:138–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00391-3
27. Chew MT. Spectrum and management of dentofacial deformities in a multiethnic Asian population. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:806–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0806:SAMODD]2.0.CO;2
28. Ong MAH. Spectrum of dentofacial deformities: a retrospective survey. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:239–42.
29. Marques CG, Maniglia JV, Molina FD. Perfil do Serviço de Cirurgia Ortognática de uma escola médica. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;76:600–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000500011
30. Castro V, do Prado CJ, Neto AIT, Zanetta-Barbosa D. Assessment of the epidemiological profile of patients with dentofacial deformities who underwent orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:e271-5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828f28f3
31. Sato FRL, Mannarino FS, Asprino L, de Moraes M. Prevalence and treatment of dentofacial deformities on a multiethnic population: a retrospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;18:173–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0396-3
32. Phillips C, Broder HL, Bennett ME. Dentofacial disharmony: motivations for seeking treatment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:7–15.
33. Mazzoni S, Badiali G, Lancellotti L, Babbi L, Bianchi A, Marchetti C. Simulation-guided navigation: a new approach to improve intraoperative three-dimensional reproducibility during orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1698–705. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f3c6a8
34. Tucker S, Cevidanes LHS, Styner M, Kim H, Reyes M, Proffit W, et al. Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:2412–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.058
35. Nagasaka H, Sugawara J, Kawamura H, Nanda R. “ Surgery first” skeletal Class III correction using the Skeletal Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2009;43:97.
36. Hernández-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martínez R, Peiró-Guijarro MA. Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: what have we learned? A comprehensive workflow based on 45 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:376–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.013
37. Peiro-Guijarro MA, Guijarro-Martinez R, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;149:448–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.022
38. Villegas C, Janakiraman N, Uribe F, Nanda R. Rotation of the maxillomandibular complex to enhance esthetics using a" surgery first" approach. J Clin Orthod JCO. 2012;46:85–91.
View on SCiNiTO
Top