Elsharkawy, L., Elprince, N., Sweedan, A. (2021). EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH A MODIFIED SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE USING XENOGENIC BONE GRAFT (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL). Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), 29-36. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.33084.1082
Lubna F. Elsharkawy; Nagy H. Elprince; Ahmed O. Sweedan. "EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH A MODIFIED SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE USING XENOGENIC BONE GRAFT (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)". Alexandria Dental Journal, 46, 3, 2021, 29-36. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.33084.1082
Elsharkawy, L., Elprince, N., Sweedan, A. (2021). 'EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH A MODIFIED SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE USING XENOGENIC BONE GRAFT (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)', Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), pp. 29-36. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.33084.1082
Elsharkawy, L., Elprince, N., Sweedan, A. EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH A MODIFIED SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE USING XENOGENIC BONE GRAFT (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL). Alexandria Dental Journal, 2021; 46(3): 29-36. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.33084.1082
EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT WITH A MODIFIED SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE USING XENOGENIC BONE GRAFT (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)
1Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background: Modified Socket shield technique, is an approach used to help maintain buccal bone level after implant insertion. However, the significance of bone grafting of the gap between the labial shield and the implant, in improving bone regeneration and prevention of the soft tissue ingrowth, has been described. Aim of the study: Evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes of using xenogenic bone graft on outcome of immediate dental implant placement using the modified socket shield technique. Material and method: 16 patients were divided into two study groups. Control group received an immediate implant with modified socket shield technique. Test group received immediate implant with modified socket shield and bone graft put in the buccal gap. Outcome measurement was primary and secondary implant stability measurement and radiographic evaluation. Results: Peri-implant BMD after 6 months for the test group showed to increase with a % change median of 39.4 % and this was found to be significantly higher than the control group. Implant secondary stability was found to be significantly higher in the test group with a median of 78 ISQ compared to 73 ISQ for the control group. Conclusion: DBBM is effective in healing of peri-implant defect and provides an appropriate stability and enhanced BMD. However, this technique requires proper case selection and is considered highly sensitive. Abbreviations: BMD = bone mineral density, BBH = Buccal bone height, ISQ = Implant stability quotient. . DBBM = Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral.;
Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips
versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2002;18(1):53–8.
Araújo M, Linder E, Lindhe J. Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: An experimental study in dog.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(1):1–6.
Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss®. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2003;14(2):137–43.
Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous Bovine Bone Mineral in Healing of Human Extraction Sockets: 2. Histochemical Observations
at 9 Months. J Periodontol. 2001;72(2):152–9.
Caneva M, Botticelli D, Pantani F, Baffone GM, Rangel IG, Lang NP. Deproteinized bovine bone mineral in marginal defects at
implants installed immediately into extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(1):106–
12.
Becker W, Clokie C, Sennerby L, Urist MR, Becker BE. Histologic Findings After Implantation and Evaluation of Different
Grafting Materials and Titanium Micro Screws Into Extraction Sockets: Case Reports. J Periodontol. 1998;69(4):414–21.
Hallman M, Lundgren S, Sennerby L. Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% autogenous bone mixed with fibrin glue. Clin Implant Dent Relat
Res. 2001;3(2):87–96.
Hsu KM, Choi BH, Ko CY, Kim HS, Xuan F, Jeong SM. Ridge Alterations following Immediate Implant Placement and the
Treatment of Bone Defects with Bio-Oss in an Animal Model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(5):690–5.
Jensen T, Schou S, Gundersen HJG, Forman JL, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor
augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(6):635–44.
Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Correlation between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact: A retrospective histological and histomorphometrical study of seven titanium implants retrieved from humans. Clin Implant Dent
Relat Res. 2006;8(4):218–22.
Andreotti AM, Goiato MC, Nobrega AS, Freitas da Silva EV, Filho HG, Pellizzer EP, et al. Relationship Between Implant Stability
Measurements Obtained by Two Different Devices: A Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2017;88(3):281–8.
Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone
characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(3):275–80.