Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Saleh, A., El- Mahallawy, A., Ragab, H. (2021). MACRO VERSUS MICRO THREAD DESIGN IMPLANT AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE STABILITY. Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(Issue 1), 43-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144843
Ahmed Fouad Saleh; Ahmed S. El- Mahallawy; Hala R. Ragab. "MACRO VERSUS MICRO THREAD DESIGN IMPLANT AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE STABILITY". Alexandria Dental Journal, 46, Issue 1, 2021, 43-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144843
Saleh, A., El- Mahallawy, A., Ragab, H. (2021). 'MACRO VERSUS MICRO THREAD DESIGN IMPLANT AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE STABILITY', Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(Issue 1), pp. 43-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144843
Saleh, A., El- Mahallawy, A., Ragab, H. MACRO VERSUS MICRO THREAD DESIGN IMPLANT AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE STABILITY. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2021; 46(Issue 1): 43-50. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144843

MACRO VERSUS MICRO THREAD DESIGN IMPLANT AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE STABILITY

Article 7, Volume 46, Issue 1, April 2021, Page 43-50  XML PDF (599.58 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144843
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Fouad Saleh email 1; Ahmed S. El- Mahallawy2; Hala R. Ragab3
1Oral and maxillofacial surgery, density, Alexandria university, Alexandria, Egypt
2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
3Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
Introduction:Dental implants are considered stable tools for replacing missing teeth, achieving long-term success rates above 90 percent, and their use in dental practice has become normal. One of the reasons to this success is the primary reliability of an implant. Implant design is one of the main factors that play a role in stability.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the role of the Macro thread design and the Micro thread design on implant stability through the use of the Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA).
Materials and Methods: The study was carried out on 6 patients, each of these patients has missing teeth on each side of posterior area in the lower jaw. All the right sides received Micro thread design implant (dentium implant,) and the left side received Macro thread design implant (Megagen AnyRidge). After dental implants were placed in their sites, the stability was measured by using the Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) to assess the stability of the two types of implants at three times periods: At the time of placing the implant, 3 months and 6 months.
Results: The mean implant Stability value for Group A was 70.57±5.74 immediately post-operatively, on the 3 month to 77.14±6.74 and reach 84.29±6.02 on the 6 month, for Group B was 63.29±6.58 immediately post-operatively, on the 3 month 70.57 ± 4.69 and on the 6 month 77.14±4.53. The mean bone density values for Group A at 3 months was 481.98± 51.78 and at 6th month was 504.28± 47.50, in Group B the 3 months was 439.54±70.49 and at 6th month was 463.83± 74.44.
Conclusion: The Micro thread design implants shows higher stability than Macro thread design.
Keywords
Osseo integration; Implant design; Dentium implant; Megagen AnyRidge; Resonance Frequency designs available Analysis; CBCT
Main Subjects
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
References
  1.  Gehrke S, da Silva U, Del Fabbro M. Does Implant Design Affect Implant Primary Stability? A Resonance Frequency Analysis–Based Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41:e281-e6.
  2. Javed F, Ahmed H, Crespi R, Romanos G. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013;5:162-7.
  3. Ryu H, Namgung C, Lee J, Lim Y. The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:547-54.
  4. McCullough J, Klokkevold P. The effect of implant macro-thread design on implant stability in the early post-operative period: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1218-26.
  5. Chowdhary R, Halldin A, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A. Influence of Micro Threads Alteration on Osseointegration and Primary Stability of Implants: An FEA and In Vivo Analysis in Rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:562-9.
  6. Rathmell JP, Hill B. Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pain, 5th E-dition. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1914.
  7. Schnitman P, Shulman L. Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;98:373-7.
  8. Landry RG, Turnbull RS, Howley T. Effectiveness of benzydamyne HCl in the treatment of periodontal post-surgical patients. Res Clin Forums. 1988;10:105-18.
  9. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008; 47:51-66.
  10. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:261-7.
  11. Brisman DL. The effect of speed, pressure, and time on bone temperature during the drilling of implant sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:35-7.
  12. Esposito M, Hirsch J, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:527-51.
  13. Gapski R, Wang H, Mascarenhas P, Lang N. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:515-27.
  14. Sakoh J, Wahlmann U, Stender E, Nat R, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W. Primary stability of a conical implant and a hybrid, cylindric screw-type implant in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:560-6.
  15. Rozé J, Babu S, Saffarzadeh A, Gayet-Delacroix M, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P. Correlating implant stability to bone structure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1140-5.
  16. Bornstein MM, Cionca N, Mombelli A. Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:12-27.
  17. Gomez-de Diego R, Mang-de la Rosa M, Romero-Perez M, Cutando-Soriano A, Lopez-Valverde-Centeno A. Indications and contraindications of dental implants in medically compromised patients: Update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:e483-9.
  18. Naser AZ, Etemadi S, Rismanchian M, Sheikhi M, Tavakoli M. Comparison of Conventional and Standardized Bone Densitometry around Implants in Periapical Radiographs during a Three Months Period. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011;8:33-8
  19. Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell™mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:598-604.
  20. Kessler-Liechti G, Zix J, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the edentulous mandible by means of resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:353-8.
  21. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:234-43.
  22. Jaramillo R, Santos R, Lázaro P, Romero M, Rios-Santos J, Bullón P, et al. Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ. Implant Dent. 2014;23:351-6.
  23. Orsini E, Giavaresi G, Trirè A, Ottani V, Salgar-ello S. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:383-92.
  24. Lan T, Du J, Pan C, Lee H, Chung W. Biomechanical analysis of alveolar bone stress around implants with different thread designs and pitches in the mandibular molar area. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:363-9.
  25. Kong L, Liu BL, Hu KJ, Li DH. Song YL. Ma P, et al. Optimized thrend pitch design and stress analysis of the cylinder screwed dental implant. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006:24:509-12.
  26. Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang H. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:129-36.
  27. Gehrke SA, Marin GW. Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with three different designs: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits. Ann Anat. 2015;199:30-5.
  28. Sabeva E, Peev S, Miteva M, Georgieva M. The impact of the thread design compared to the impact of the surface topography on the primary stability of implants inserted into fresh pig ribs. Scr Sci Med Dent. 2017;3:60-4.
  29. McCullough J, Klokkevold P. The effect of implant macro-thread design on implant stability in the early post-operative period: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1218-26.
Statistics
Article View: 448
PDF Download: 1,242