Hassanein, P., Khalil, A., Talaat, D. (2021). EFFECTIVENESS OF MUCOSAL VIBRATION ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK ADMINISTRATION IN CHILDREN (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial). Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(Issue 1), 167-172. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144853
Passant H. Hassanein; Amani Khalil; Dalia M. Talaat. "EFFECTIVENESS OF MUCOSAL VIBRATION ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK ADMINISTRATION IN CHILDREN (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)". Alexandria Dental Journal, 46, Issue 1, 2021, 167-172. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144853
Hassanein, P., Khalil, A., Talaat, D. (2021). 'EFFECTIVENESS OF MUCOSAL VIBRATION ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK ADMINISTRATION IN CHILDREN (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)', Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(Issue 1), pp. 167-172. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144853
Hassanein, P., Khalil, A., Talaat, D. EFFECTIVENESS OF MUCOSAL VIBRATION ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK ADMINISTRATION IN CHILDREN (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial). Alexandria Dental Journal, 2021; 46(Issue 1): 167-172. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.144853
EFFECTIVENESS OF MUCOSAL VIBRATION ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK ADMINISTRATION IN CHILDREN (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
1Demonstrator at pediatric dentistry and dental public health department, Alexandria university.
2Professor at pediatric dentistry and dental public health department, Alexandria university.
3Associate professor at pediatric dentistry and dental public health department, Alexandria university.
Abstract
clinic is the major concern especially when dealing with children. It is mandatory to use local anesthesia to keep any discomfort or pain to the minimum. Unfortunately, there is discomfort associated with injection especially inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) as it is considered as one of the most painful injections. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of DentalVibe (DV) and 20% benzocaine gel on pain perception experienced by boys and girls during inferior alveolar nerve block administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a cross over randomized controlled clinical trial where 60 children (30 males and 30 females) aged 5-7 years were selected from the outpatient clinic of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University after securing necessary consents. Children with bilateral mandibular molars indicated for pulpotomy treatment were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups. During the first visit, IANB was performed either with vibration using DV at the injection side or after the application of 20% benzocaine gel. After two weeks, the alternative technique was used (cross-over). In each visit, subjective pain was evaluated using the Wong-Baker Faces pain rating scale (PRS). RESULTS: Wong Baker Faces PRS showed a statistically significant difference between DV and benzocaine gel groups in favor of DV (P ≤ 0.001); where DV group scored lower mean pain value (0.80 ± 1.34) while benzocaine gel scored 2.60 ± 3.22. Regarding gender influence, no significant difference was reported in the pain scores of the two pain reduction methods. CONCLUSION: The use of the DV injection system reduced the pain associated with IANB administration in children. Regarding gender, it was found to have no influence on pain perception.
1.Craig K. Emotional aspects of pain. In: WALL PD, R M, eds. Textbook of pain. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingston; 1989:220-30. 2.Armfield JM, Heaton L. Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: a review. Aust Dent J. 2013;58:390-407. 3. Shim Y-S, Kim A-H, Jeon E-Y, An S-Y. Dental fear & anxiety and dental pain in children and adolescents; a systemic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015;15:53-61. 4.Weisenberg M. Pain and pain control. Psychol Bull. 1977;84:1008-44. 5.Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A Systematic Review of Faces Scales for the Self-report of Pain Intensity in Children. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1168-e98. 6.Von Baeyer CL. Children’s self-reports of pain intensity: scale selection, limitations and interpretation. Pain Res Manag. 2006;11:157-62. 7.Eli I, Bar-Tal Y, Fuss Z, Korff E. Effect of biological sex differences on the perception of acute pain stimulation in the dental setting. Pain Res Manag. 1996;1:201-6. 8. Fillingim RB, Maixner W. Gender differences in the responses to noxious stimuli. Pain forum. 1995;4:209-21. 9. Perry S, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. Effect of Operator and Subject Gender on Injection Pain: A Randomized Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015;41:141-5. 10. Sermet Elbay U, Elbay M, Yildirim S, Kaya E, Kaya C, Ugurluel C, et al. Evaluation of the injection pain with the use of DentalVibe injection system during supraperiosteal anaesthesia in children: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:336-45. 11. Mutalik S. How to make local anesthesia less painful. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2008;1:37. 12. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA, Jones JE. Local anesthesia and pain control for the child and adolescent. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR, eds. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 10th ed. St. Louis, Missouri, Elsevier Inc; 2011:241-52. 13. Veneva ER, Belcheva AB. Local anesthesia in pediatric patients–a review of current and alternative methods, devices and techniques. Folia Med. 2018;60:381-8. 14. Tandon S, Kalia G, Sharma M, Mathur R, Rathore K, Gandhi M. Comparative Evaluation of Mucosal Vibrator with Topical Anesthetic Gel to reduce Pain during Administration of Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients: An in vivo Study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;11:261. 15. Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V, Chandra A. Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013;4:19-24. 16. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150:971-9. 17. Dickenson AH. Editorial I: Gate Control Theory of pain stands the test of time. BJA; 2002;88:755-7. 18. Sufka KJ, Price DD. Gate control theory reconsidered. Brain and Mind. 2002;3:277-90. 19. Shilpapriya M, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN, Sakthivel R, Selvaraju G, Vijayakumar P. Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015;33:173. 20. Ching D, Finkelman M, Loo CY. Effect of the DentalVibe injection system on pain during local anesthesia injections in adolescent patients. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:51-5. 21. Dak-Albab R, Al-Monaqel MB, Koshha R, Shakhashero H. A comparison between the effectiveness of vibration with Dentalvibe and benzocaine gel in relieving pain associated with mandibular injection: a randomized clinical trial. APIC. 2016;20:43-9. 22. Frankl S. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child. 1962;29:150-63. 23. Killeen PR. An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychol sci. 2005;16:345-53. 24. Daniel WW, Cross CL. Estimation. In: Brady J, ed. Biostatistics; a foundation for analysis in the health sciences 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018:143-88. 25. Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:619. 26. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. BRM. 2007;39:175-91. 27.Schwartz, Steven, and Ari Kupietzky. local anesthesia. In: Wright GZ , Kupietzky A,eds. Behavior Management in Dentistry for Children 2nd ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley, 2014:107-24. 28.Nusstein JM, Beck M. Effectiveness of 20% benzocaine as a topical anesthetic for intraoral injections. Anesth prog. 2003;50:159. 29.Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988;14:9-17. 30.Wilcoxon F, Katti S, Wilcox RA. Critical values and probability levels for the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Selected tables in mathematical statistics. 1970;1:171-259. 31.McKnight PE, Najab J. Mann‐Whitney U Test. In: Weiner IB, Craighead WE eds. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010:1-. 32.Roeber B, Wallace DP, Rothe V, Salama F, Allen KD. Evaluation of the effects of the VibraJect attachment on pain in children receiving local anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:46-50. 33.Ungor C, Tosun E, Dayisoylu EH, Taskesen F, Senel FC. The effects of vibration on pain and anxiety during local anesthesia administration. JSM Dent. 2014;2:1022. 34.Raslan N, Masri R. A randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels during three types of oral anesthetic injections and the effect of Dentalvibe((R)) on injection pain in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:102-10. 35.Kaufman E, Epstein JB, Naveh E, Gorsky M, Gross A, Cohen G. A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections. Anesth prog. 2005;52:122-7.
36.Aminabadi NA, Farahani RMZ, Oskouei SG. Site-specificity of pain sensitivity to intraoral anesthetic injections in children. J Oral Sci. 2009;51:239-43. 37.Bagherian A, Sheikhfathollahi M. Children's behavioral pain reactions during local anesthetic injection using cotton-roll vibration method compared with routine topical anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. Dent Res J. 2016;13:272-7. 38.Eli I, Baht R, Kozlovsky A, Simon H. Effect of gender on acute pain prediction and memory in periodontal surgery. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:99-103. 39.Hägglöf B. Psychological reaction by children of various ages to hospital care and invasive procedures. Acta paediatrica. 1999;88:72-8.
View on SCiNiTO
Top