• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
El-Sehly, N., Abd Elgelel, A., Rady, N., El Banna, A. (2021). EFFICIENCY OF RETENTION OF TWO ATTACHMENT DESIGNS USED FOR ALL ON FOUR MANDIBULAR INCLINED IMPLANTS ASSISTED OVERDENTURE. Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), 136-142. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.42368.1101
Nermine El-Sehly; Ahmed Abd Elgelel; Nermeen Abdelsalam Rady; Ahmed El Banna. "EFFICIENCY OF RETENTION OF TWO ATTACHMENT DESIGNS USED FOR ALL ON FOUR MANDIBULAR INCLINED IMPLANTS ASSISTED OVERDENTURE". Alexandria Dental Journal, 46, 3, 2021, 136-142. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.42368.1101
El-Sehly, N., Abd Elgelel, A., Rady, N., El Banna, A. (2021). 'EFFICIENCY OF RETENTION OF TWO ATTACHMENT DESIGNS USED FOR ALL ON FOUR MANDIBULAR INCLINED IMPLANTS ASSISTED OVERDENTURE', Alexandria Dental Journal, 46(3), pp. 136-142. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.42368.1101
El-Sehly, N., Abd Elgelel, A., Rady, N., El Banna, A. EFFICIENCY OF RETENTION OF TWO ATTACHMENT DESIGNS USED FOR ALL ON FOUR MANDIBULAR INCLINED IMPLANTS ASSISTED OVERDENTURE. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2021; 46(3): 136-142. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.42368.1101

EFFICIENCY OF RETENTION OF TWO ATTACHMENT DESIGNS USED FOR ALL ON FOUR MANDIBULAR INCLINED IMPLANTS ASSISTED OVERDENTURE

Article 26, Volume 46, Issue 3, December 2021, Page 136-142  XML PDF (922.36 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.42368.1101
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Nermine El-Sehly1; Ahmed Abd Elgelel email orcid 2; Nermeen Abdelsalam Rady3; Ahmed El Banna4
1Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Professor of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University.
3Lecturer of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
4Department of Biomaterials ,Faculty of Dentistry , Ain Shames University .
Abstract
Introduction: Reduction of retention should be considered when selecting an attachment for inclined implants following the all-on-four concept.
Aim of the study: Evaluation the retentive force of mandibular implant-assisted overdentures with two different abutment designs following the all-on-four concept before and after cyclic loading.
Material and methods: Two identical completely edentulous mandible models were made with epoxy resin. Anterior two implants were placed parallel to each other in the symphyseal area and two tilted implants were placed distally inclined with 25 degree angulation at canine-1st premolar region of each model by using a 3D Printed surgical guide. For group I (study group/1st model) OT-Equator abutment was connected to the anterior parallel implants and OT-Equator with smart box abutment was connected to the tilted implants. Group II (control group/2nd model) using OT-Equator abutment connected to the anterior parallel implants and angled positioner abutment connected to tilted implants. A universal testing machine was used to evaluatethe retentive force was of all overdentures with different attachments following the all-on-four concept before and after cycling loading then compared with control group.
Results: When retentive forces of all overdentures with different attachments following the all-on-four concept before and after cyclic loading were compared, there was significant difference of retentive forces between different resilient caps which decreased after cyclic loading for both groups (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The OT-Equator with smart box attachment group showed greater value of retentive force compared with the Angled Positioner attachment group before and after cyclic loading.
Keywords
Implant overdenture; tilted implants; OT Equator; Smart box; Angled positioner
Main Subjects
Prosthodontics
Statistics
Article View: 387
PDF Download: 662
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.