Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Issue Issue 4
Special Issue for the 22nd Alexandria International Dental Congress, Egyptian IADR, and the 5th International Congress of the Egyptian Pediatric Dentistry Association
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Saad, M., Mahmoud, E., Reda Afifi, R. (2022). FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT CAD/CAM CERAMIC INLAYS (IN VITRO STUDY).. Alexandria Dental Journal, 47(1), 122-126. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.54872.1143
Maram Hassan Saad; EL Sayed Mostafa Mahmoud; Rania Reda Afifi. "FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT CAD/CAM CERAMIC INLAYS (IN VITRO STUDY).". Alexandria Dental Journal, 47, 1, 2022, 122-126. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.54872.1143
Saad, M., Mahmoud, E., Reda Afifi, R. (2022). 'FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT CAD/CAM CERAMIC INLAYS (IN VITRO STUDY).', Alexandria Dental Journal, 47(1), pp. 122-126. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.54872.1143
Saad, M., Mahmoud, E., Reda Afifi, R. FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT CAD/CAM CERAMIC INLAYS (IN VITRO STUDY).. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2022; 47(1): 122-126. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.54872.1143

FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF DIFFERENT CAD/CAM CERAMIC INLAYS (IN VITRO STUDY).

Article 7, Volume 47, Issue 1, April 2022, Page 122-126  XML PDF (259.79 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2021.54872.1143
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Maram Hassan Saad email 1; EL Sayed Mostafa Mahmoud2; Rania Reda Afifi3
1Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Conservative Dentistry Departement, Faculty of Dentistry , Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
3Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background: Ceramic inlays have picked up prominence due to their superior esthetic characteristics and work-ability. In addition, they allow chair-side restorations to be completed in one appointment.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the in-vitro fracture resistance of three CAD/CAM ceramic materials.
Materials and Method: Mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) inlays (n=33) were fabricated from three CAD/CAM materials: Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS-EMAX CAD), Zirconia-reinforced lithuim silicate (CELTRA-DUO) and hybrid composite filled with zirconium silicate particles (SHOFU HC BLOCK). Digital impressions of the inlay cavities prepared in the maxillary first premolar teeth were taken by CEREC scanner then the restorations were milled using CEREC MCXL milling machine.
Samples were cemented to MOD inlay cavities with resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE) and then fracture resistance test was performed by the Universal Testing Machine.
Results: The fracture resistance values of inlays fabricated from lithium disilicate EMAX CAD (1104.627) was higher than those from CELTRA DUO (937.024) followed by those of SHOFU (724.417). There was a statistical significance between group A (EMAX) and group C (SHOFU) p=0.005. The mode of failure of the restorations presented mixed types of failure (cohesive and catastrophic).
Conclusion: Strengthening with zirconia particles did not have a positive influence on the fracture resistance of neither the glass ceramic nor the composite resin materials tested.
Keywords
Ceramics; CAD/CAM; Inlays; Fracture resistance
Main Subjects
Conservative dentistry
Statistics
Article View: 357
PDF Download: 930