• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Abdelaty, A., Soliman, M., Shokry, M. (2024). EVALUATION OF FLAPLESS DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN CONTROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL). Alexandria Dental Journal, 49(1), 106-115. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.172609.1326
Ahmed Elsayed Abdelaty; Mahitab Mahmoud Soliman; Mohamed Mamdouh Shokry. "EVALUATION OF FLAPLESS DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN CONTROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)". Alexandria Dental Journal, 49, 1, 2024, 106-115. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.172609.1326
Abdelaty, A., Soliman, M., Shokry, M. (2024). 'EVALUATION OF FLAPLESS DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN CONTROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)', Alexandria Dental Journal, 49(1), pp. 106-115. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.172609.1326
Abdelaty, A., Soliman, M., Shokry, M. EVALUATION OF FLAPLESS DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN CONTROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL). Alexandria Dental Journal, 2024; 49(1): 106-115. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.172609.1326

EVALUATION OF FLAPLESS DENTAL IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN CONTROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)

Article 25, Volume 49, Issue 1, April 2024, Page 106-115  XML PDF (516.01 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2022.172609.1326
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ahmed Elsayed Abdelaty email 1; Mahitab Mahmoud Soliman2; Mohamed Mamdouh Shokryorcid 1
1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2oral and maxillofacial surgery , faculty of dentistry , Alexandria university
Abstract
Introduction: Traditionally, when a dental implant is placed, a flap can be raised to better visualize the position of surgical site, so the bone fenestrations risk can be reduced when there is limited bone available. Recently, for patients with thick gingival biotype (≥2 mm) and sufficient bone volume in recipient site, flapless implant surgery is considered a new concept, where dental implants are inserted into crestal bone without flap elevation.
Objectives: To compare the outcome of dental implants placed in the maxillary posterior area with flapless technique versus conventional surgical technique in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes.
Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical study was done on twenty controlled type 2 diabetic patients, with missing maxillary posterior teeth. The patients were separated into two groups: In group A, ten implants were inserted in maxillary posterior area using a flapless technique and in group B, ten implants were inserted in maxillary posterior area using a flap surgical technique. All patients underwent clinical and radiographical evaluations for 8 months.
Results: The flap approach showed a statistically significant higher mean pain severity during the first, third and seventh day, higher swelling only on the first day and lesser implant stability after four months than the flapless technique. For both groups, during the fourth and eighth months period, there was no significant difference in crestal bone loss.
Conclusion: The flapless dental implant placement could be considered for controlled type 2 diabetic patients to reduce post-operative pain and swelling and for better implant stability.
Keywords
Implant; Crestal bone; Flapless design; CBCT; Guided surgery
Main Subjects
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
Statistics
Article View: 246
PDF Download: 351
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.