• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Dental Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 50 (2025)
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Issue Issue 3
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 3
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 3
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 2
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 2
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 2
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Issue Issue 1
A (Oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral medicine, periodontology, oral radiology, oral pathology, oral biology)
Issue Issue 1
B (Endodontics, Prosthodontics, Fixed prosthodontics, Conservative dentistry, Dental Biomaterials)
Issue Issue 1
C (Pediatric dentistry, Dental public health, Orthodontics)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Lulu, A., Abdel Kader, S., Abdel Raheem, I. (2024). FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND MARGINAL FIT OF ENDOCROWN RESTORATIONS USING THREE DIFFERENT CAD-CAM MATERIALS. Alexandria Dental Journal, 49(3), 142-149. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.222675.1397
Abdallah Lulu; Sanaa Hussein Abdel Kader; Islam Abdel Raheem. "FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND MARGINAL FIT OF ENDOCROWN RESTORATIONS USING THREE DIFFERENT CAD-CAM MATERIALS". Alexandria Dental Journal, 49, 3, 2024, 142-149. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.222675.1397
Lulu, A., Abdel Kader, S., Abdel Raheem, I. (2024). 'FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND MARGINAL FIT OF ENDOCROWN RESTORATIONS USING THREE DIFFERENT CAD-CAM MATERIALS', Alexandria Dental Journal, 49(3), pp. 142-149. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.222675.1397
Lulu, A., Abdel Kader, S., Abdel Raheem, I. FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND MARGINAL FIT OF ENDOCROWN RESTORATIONS USING THREE DIFFERENT CAD-CAM MATERIALS. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2024; 49(3): 142-149. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.222675.1397

FRACTURE RESISTANCE AND MARGINAL FIT OF ENDOCROWN RESTORATIONS USING THREE DIFFERENT CAD-CAM MATERIALS

Article 7, Volume 49, Issue 3, December 2024, Page 142-149  XML PDF (400.65 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2023.222675.1397
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Abdallah Lulu email 1; Sanaa Hussein Abdel Kader2; Islam Abdel Raheem3
1B.D.S Faculty of Dentistry Pharos University
2Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria Egypt
3Lecturer of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Abstract
Introduction: Endocrown restorations offer a promising alternative to restore endodontically treated teeth. However, various materials are available without being thoroughly evaluated.
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate marginal fit and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations using three CAD-CAM materials.
Materials and Methods: Eighteen freshly extracted human permanent mandibular first molars were prepared to receive endocrown restoration. Teeth were randomly allocated into three groups according to material type (n=6). (LD): Lithium Disilicate, (FCZ): full contour zirconia, (RNC): resin nanoceramic. All Endocrown restorations were fabricated by using CAD-CAM. Restorations were adhesively luted to the corresponding prepared teeth and subjected to thermomechanical cycling corresponding to six months of clinical service. Marginal gap was measured before cementation and after cementation and aging using optical microscope. For measuring fracture resistance, specimens were loaded till failure by using Universal Testing Machine. Failure mode analysis was evaluated by optical microscope. Fracture resistance was analyzed by One-Way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test while marginal gap was analyzed by Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test.
Results: FCZ had the highest fracture load compared to RNC and LD. Zirconia recorded largest microgaps before cementation.
Conclusion: FCZ showed the highest values of fracture resistance. LD and RNC ceramics showed comparable fracture resistance values favoring their use as endocrown restorations. The tested groups showed marginal fit results within the limits of clinically acceptable standards. The material type and thermomechanical aging had a significant effect on marginal gap.
Keywords
Fracture resistance; Marginal fit; Resin nanoceramics; Zirconia; Lithium disilicate
Main Subjects
Fixed prosthodontics
Statistics
Article View: 200
PDF Download: 355
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.