Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Youssef, M., Shaaban, A., Eldibany, R. (2015). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BONE DENSITY AND IMPLANT STABILITY. Alexandria Dental Journal, 40(1), 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58726
M Youssef; A M Shaaban; R Eldibany. "THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BONE DENSITY AND IMPLANT STABILITY". Alexandria Dental Journal, 40, 1, 2015, 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58726
Youssef, M., Shaaban, A., Eldibany, R. (2015). 'THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BONE DENSITY AND IMPLANT STABILITY', Alexandria Dental Journal, 40(1), pp. 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58726
Youssef, M., Shaaban, A., Eldibany, R. THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BONE DENSITY AND IMPLANT STABILITY. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2015; 40(1): 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58726

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BONE DENSITY AND IMPLANT STABILITY

Article 3, Volume 40, Issue 1, July 2015, Page 15-21  XML PDF (417.81 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58726
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M Youssef1; A M Shaaban2; R Eldibany2
1Dentist, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
2Professor at Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
Introduction: Long-term studies have documented the successful treatment of edentulous and partially edentulous patients with endosseous titanium implants. Success rates between 81% and 93% have been reported. Successful treatment with endosseous implants is dependent upon a complex relationship of numerous factors. Bone density and implant stability are important factors for implant osseointegration which has been widely demonstrated by several authors. Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the correlation between bone density estimated by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and stability of dental implants estimated by resonance frequency analysis using Osstell ISQ. Materials and methods: Ten dentis s-clean tapered implants were inserted in posterior mandibular edentulous spaces in ten adult patients. The bone density of implants recipient sites were determined by density value (HU) using CBCT. And the implants’ stability were determined by quantitative unit called implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured by resonance frequency analysis using Osstell ISQ. Both values were determined immediately post-operatively and on intervals of 3&6 months. Results: The mean implant stability value was 67.3 ± 9.14 immediately post-operatively, then increased on the 3rd month to be 72.3 ± 3.95 & 75.2 ± 5.33 on the 6th month, there was a statistical significant increase. Also the results of the present study showed that the mean bone density value was 827.96 ± 206.85 immediately post-operatively, then increased to 890.67 ± 138 & 1018.0 ± 149.79 on the 3 rd and 6th months respectively, there was a statistical significant increase. Conclusion: There was no correlation between bone density and implant stability
Keywords
bone density; implant stability; cone beam CT; resonance frequency analysis
References
1. Att W, Stappert C. Implant therapy to improve quality of life. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 8: 573-81.
2. Vidyasagar L, Apse P. Dental implant design and biological effects on bone-implant interface. Stomatologija 2004; 6: 51-4.
3. Gulsahi A. Bone quality assessment for dental implants. Rijeka: InTech 2011: 437-52.
4. Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant'Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental im‌plants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 767-74.
5. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Avsever H, Özdemir T. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15: 893-906.
6. Cassetta M, Tarantino F, Calasso S. Conservative treatment of odontogenic keratocyst: A case report and
review of the literature. Dental Cadmos 2009; 77: 19-40. 7. Calasso S, Cassetta M, Galluccio G, Barbato E. Impacted lower second molars.DentalCadmos2008;76:41-54. 8. Cassetta M, Tarantino F, Calasso S. CAD-CAM systems in titanium customized abutment construction. Dental
Cadmos 2010; 78: 27-44.
9. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis:
measuring implant stability and osseointegration.
Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 493-8.
10. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28: 266-72.
11. Sunden S, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Accuracy and
precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Branemark dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 220-6.
12. Quesada-Garcia MP, Prados-Sanchez E, Olmedo-Gaya MV, Munoz-Soto E, Gonzalez-Rodriguez MP, Vallecillo-Capilla M. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis: A review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: 538-46.
13. Esposito M, Hirsch J, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 527-51.
14. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
15. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A crosssectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 226-333.
16. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 234- 43.
17. Rasmusson L, Kahnberg KE, Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: an experimental study in the dog mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3: 2-8.
18. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 529-39
19. Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res 2008; 31: 165-9.
20. McClanahan SF, Bartizek RD, Biesbrock AR. Identification and consequences of distinct Löe-Silness gingival index examiner styles for the clinical assessment of gingivitis. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 383-92.
21. Steflik D, Koth DL, Robinson F, McKinney R, Davis B, Morris C, et al. Prospective investigation of the single- crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: Ten-year results. J Oral Implantol 1995; 21: 8-18.

22. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branmark PI. A 15– year study of osseointegrated implant in treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral surgery 1981; 10: 387- 416.
23. Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 124-35.
24. Bornstein MM, Cionca N, Mombelli A. Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 12-27.
25. Cassetta M, Stefanelli LV, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Barbato E. How accurate is CBCT in measuring bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16: 471-8.
26. Al-Sudani RJ. Assessment of bone density after six months from dental implants placement using Computed Tomography. J Bagh Coll Dentistry 2014; 26: 126-8.
27. Sim CP, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 598-604.
28. Kessler-Liechti G, Zix J, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the edentulous mandible by means of resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 353-8.
29. Cocharan DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 1-11.
30. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone- dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992; 10: 153-201.
31. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 391-401.
32. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 261-7.
33. Jaramillo R, Santos R, Lázaro P, Romero M, Rios- Santos JV, Bullón P, et al. Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ. J Implant Dent 2014; 23: 351- 6.
34. Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 275-80.
35. Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. Five- year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: S59- 68.
36. Kim SJ, Kim MR, Rim JS, Chung SM, Shin SW. Comparison of implant stability after different implant
surface treatments in dog bone. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;
18: 415-20.
37. Farré-Pagés N, Augé-Castro ML, Alaejos-Algarra F,
Mareque-Bueno J, Ferrés-Padró E, Hernández-Alfaro F. Relation between bone density and primary implant stability. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 16: e62-7.
38. Turkyilmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN, Tözüm TF. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 716-22.
39. Sumera P, Danacib M, Telciogluc NT, Sandikcic EO, Sumerd M, Gulere AU. Assessment of the correlation between bone density and implant stability. J Exp Clin Med 2013; 30: 237-40.
40. Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, Akoğlan M, Oztunç H, Kurtoğlu C. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1016-21.

Statistics
Article View: 284
PDF Download: 1,328