EFFECT OF COLLATAPE® COLLAGEN WOUND DRESSING ALONE AND COMBINED WITH INGENIOS® SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFT ON THE SOCKET HEALING IN RABBITS

Moustafa, H; Omar, S; Osman, S; Kawana, K

doi:10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58731

EFFECT OF COLLATAPE® COLLAGEN WOUND DRESSING ALONE AND COMBINED WITH INGENIOS® SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFT ON THE SOCKET HEALING IN RABBITS

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

² Prof, Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

³ Prof, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58731

Abstract

Introduction: Socket preservation enhances healing and reduces bone loss during healing of extraction socket. Objectives: To assess the effect of bio-absorbable collagen wound dressing (CollaTape®; Zimmer) on the of healing of extraction sockets in rabbits when applied alone and combined with IngeniOs Beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) synthetic bone particles. Materials and methods: Sixteen rabbits were included in this study in which lower left first premolars were extracted and then divided into three groups including: Control group (4 animals) in which the sockets were left for normal healing, Collatape group (the sockets were closed with CollaTape collagen wound dressing alone) and IngeniOs β-TCP group (6 animals) in which the sockets were filled with synthetic bone particles and were closed with CollaTape collagen wound dressing. Euthanasia were done 2 and 6 weeks respectively. Socket healing was examined and evaluated histologically and analyzed histomorphometrically. Results: At 2 weeks of healing, it was observed in all groups that the sockets were filled with newly formed woven bone. The percentage of newly formed bone was lowest in control group followed by Collatape group while β-TCP group showed highest values. At 6 weeks healing period, the socket entrance was sealed with compact bone and the rest of the socket was filled with trabecular bone. β-TCP group showed the highest values of the percentage of the formed bone. Conclusions: It was confirmed that IngeniOs β-TCP enhances bone formation during socket healing and could be used for socket preservation

Keywords

Main Subjects

Oral biology

References

1. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2004;31(10):820-8.
2. Pagni G, Pellegrini G, Giannobile WV, Rasperini G. Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: Biological basis and treatments. International journal of dentistry. 2012;2012:1-13.
3. Dinopoulos H, Dimitriou R, Giannoudis PV. RETRACTED: Bone graft substitutes: What are the options? the surgeon. 2012;10(4):230-9.
4. Sándor G, Lam DK, Ylikontiola LP, Kainulainen VT, Oikarinen KS, Clokie CM. Autogenous bone harvesting techniques. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010;23:383.
5. Minichetti JC, D'Amore JC, Hong AY, Cleveland DB. Human histologic analysis of mineralized bone allograft (Puros) placement before implant surgery. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2004;30(2):74-82.
6. Bohner M. Resorbable biomaterials as bone graft substitutes. Materials Today. 2010;13(1):24-30.
7. Kamitakahara M, Ohtsuki C, Miyazaki T. Review paper: behavior of ceramic biomaterials derived from tricalcium phosphate in physiological condition. Journal of biomaterials applications. 2008;23(3):197-212.
8. Bohner M. Silicon-substituted calcium phosphates–a critical view. Biomaterials. 2009;30(32):6403-6.
9. Yugoshi L, Sala M, Brentegani L, Carvalho T. Histometric study of socket healing after tooth extraction in rats treated with diclofenac. Brazilian dental journal. 2002;13(2):92-6.
10. Kuboki Y, Hashimoto F, Ishibashi K. Time-dependent changes of collagen crosslinks in the socket after tooth extraction in rabbits. Journal of Dental Research. 1988;67(6):944-8.
11. MansoI J, MourãoII C, PinheiroIII F, Luiz M, FerreiraIV P, Schanaider A. Molars extraction for bone graft study in rabbits. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira. 2011;26(2):66-9.
12. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. American journal of orthodontics. 1984;86(2):95-111.
13. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2003;30(9):809-18.
14. Almazrooa SA, Noonan V, Woo S-B. Resorbable collagen membranes: histopathologic features. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2014;118(2):236-40.
15. Jain S, Kaur H, Pandav G, Dewan A, Saxena D. Collagen: Basis of Life. Universal Research Journal of Dentistry. 2014;4(1):1-9.
16. Donzelli E, Salvadè A, Mimo P, Viganò M, Morrone M, Papagna R, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells cultured on a collagen scaffold: In vitro osteogenic differentiation. Archives of oral biology. 2007;52(1):64-73.

17. Hadjidakis DJ, Androulakis II. Bone remodeling. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006;1092(1):385-96. 18. Twardowski T, Fertala A, Orgel J, San Antonio J. Type I collagen and collagen mimetics as angiogenesis promoting superpolymers. Current pharmaceutical design. 2007;13(35):3608-21.
19. Berberi A, Samarani A, Nader N, Noujeim Z, Dagher M, Kanj W, et al. Physicochemical Characteristics of Bone Substitutes Used in Oral Surgery in Comparison to Autogenous Bone. BioMed research international. 2014;2014:1-9.
20. Fei L, Wang C, Xue Y, Lin K, Chang J, Sun J. Osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts induced by calcium silicate and calcium silicate/β‐tricalcium phosphate composite bioceramics. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2012;100(5):1237-44. 21. Chazono M, Tanaka T, Kitasato S, Kikuchi T, Marumo K. Electron microscopic study on bone formation and bioresorption after implantation of β-tricalcium phosphate in rabbit models. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2008;13(6):550-5.
22. Galois L, Mainard D. Bone ingrowth into two porous ceramics with different pore sizes: an experimental study. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70(6):598-603.
23. Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. The Spine Journal. 2007;7(4):475-90.
24. Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontology 2000. 2015;68(1):122-34.
25. Kim JH, Kim CH, Kim KW. Bone healing capacity of the collagen bone filler (TERUPLUG (R)) and rhBMP-2 in the rabbit cranium defect. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2008;34(2):119-30.
26. Brkovic B, Prasad HS, Konandreas G, Milan R, Antunovic D, Sándor G, et al. Simple preservation of a maxillary extraction socket using beta-tricalcium phosphate with type I collagen: preliminary clinical and histomorphometric observations. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008;74(6):523-8.
27. Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjørting‐Hansen E, Schenk R, Buser D. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β‐tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clinical oral implants research. 2006;17(3):237-43. 28. Araújo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. β‐tricalcium phosphate in the early phase of socket healing: an experimental study in the dog. Clinical oral implants research. 2010;21(4):445-54.