1. Ahmed WM. Gingival Microleakage of Class V Resin Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts. 2012. University of Toronto.
2. Ilie N, Hickel R. Macro-, micro- and nanomechanical investigations on siloraneandmethacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 810-9.
3. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; (Suppl 6): 119-44.
4. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e100–e21.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28.
7. Bradna P, Vrbova R, Dudek M, Roubickova A, Housova D. Comparison of bonding performance of self-etching and etch & rinse adhesives on human dentin using reliability analysis. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 423-9.
8. Vargas MA, Swift EJ. Microleakage of resin composite with wet versus dry bonding. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 187-9.
9. Tomczak M, Tomczak E, Kleka P, Lew R. Using power analysis to estimate appropriate sample size. TRENDS in Sport Sciences 2014; 4: 195-206.
10. Ahmadi R. In vitro comparison of microleakage of nanofilled and flowable composite in restoring class V cavity in primary teeth. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 2013; 15: 45-50.
11. Gale MS, Darvel BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27: 89-99.
12. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Review microleakage. J Dent 1992; 20: 3-10.
13. Hegde MN, Vyapaka P, Shetty S. A comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different newer direct composite resins using a self-etching primer in class V cavities: An in vitro. J Conserv Dent 2009; 12: 160-3.
14. Al-Razooki AA, UR Rehman MM. Microleakage in Class V nanofilled composite compared with traditional hybrid and flowable composite restorations: An in vitro study. Pak Oral Dental J 2010; 30: 215-19.
15. Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of sodium sulfinate salts on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems exposed to attenuated light-activation. J Dent 2009; 37: 219-27.
16. Gale MS, Darvel BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27: 89-99.
17. Mehmet D, Fatma A, Emrullah B, Bayram I, Cafer S, Hakan Ç, et al. A comparison of the levels of microleakage of five adhesive. J Res Dent 2013; 1: 66-71.
18. Sensi LG, Lopes GC, Monteiro S Jr, Baratieri LN, Vieira LC. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers adhesives. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 63-8.
19. Abo T, Uno S, Sano H. Comparison of bonding efficacy of an all-in-one adhesive with a self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 286-92.
20. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents Am J Dent 2004; 17: 257-61.
21. Bracket WW, Haisch LD, Pearce MG, Brackett MG. Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 42-5.
22. Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C. Chuang SF, Li F. Factors contrib-uting to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II, Single-bottle, Totaletch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 91-105.
23. Sánchez-Ayala A, Farias-Neto A, Vilanova LSR, Gomes JC, Gomes OMM. Marginal microleakage of class V resin based Composite restorations bonded with six one-step self-etch systems. Braz Oral Res 2013; 27: 225-30.
24. El Sayed HY, Abdalla AI, Shalby ME. Marginal microleakage of composite resin restorations bonded by desensitizing one step self-etch adhesive. Tanta Dent J 2014; 11: 180-8.