Home Articles List Article Information
Alexandria Dental Journal
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 49 (2024)
Volume Volume 48 (2023)
Volume Volume 47 (2022)
Volume Volume 46 (2021)
Volume Volume 45 (2020)
Volume Volume 44 (2019)
Volume Volume 43 (2018)
Volume Volume 42 (2017)
Volume Volume 41 (2016)
Volume Volume 40 (2015)
Baraka, M., Hanno, A., Bakry, N., Medra, A., Moussa, H. (2016). DENTAL ARCH DIMENSIONS IN SURGICALLY REPAIRED UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP AND PALATE OF EGYPTIAN CHILDREN BY OSLO PROTOCOL. Alexandria Dental Journal, 41(1), 111-116. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59185
M Baraka; A Hanno; N Bakry; A Medra; H Moussa. "DENTAL ARCH DIMENSIONS IN SURGICALLY REPAIRED UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP AND PALATE OF EGYPTIAN CHILDREN BY OSLO PROTOCOL". Alexandria Dental Journal, 41, 1, 2016, 111-116. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59185
Baraka, M., Hanno, A., Bakry, N., Medra, A., Moussa, H. (2016). 'DENTAL ARCH DIMENSIONS IN SURGICALLY REPAIRED UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP AND PALATE OF EGYPTIAN CHILDREN BY OSLO PROTOCOL', Alexandria Dental Journal, 41(1), pp. 111-116. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59185
Baraka, M., Hanno, A., Bakry, N., Medra, A., Moussa, H. DENTAL ARCH DIMENSIONS IN SURGICALLY REPAIRED UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP AND PALATE OF EGYPTIAN CHILDREN BY OSLO PROTOCOL. Alexandria Dental Journal, 2016; 41(1): 111-116. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59185

DENTAL ARCH DIMENSIONS IN SURGICALLY REPAIRED UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP AND PALATE OF EGYPTIAN CHILDREN BY OSLO PROTOCOL

Article 18, Volume 41, Issue 1, April 2016, Page 111-116  XML PDF (667.26 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2016.59185
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
M Baraka* ; A Hanno* ; N Bakry* ; A Medra* ; H Moussa*
Demonstrator at the Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Non-syndromic cleft lip and palate is a complex trait caused by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors resulting in various forms of malocclusion mostly affecting maxillary dental arch.
AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the dental arch dimensions in surgically repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate children according to Oslo protocol with those of healthy matching non-cleft children in Egypt. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comparative cross-sectional study design was used. Thirty-one non-syndromic children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), aging 4-9 years, and fulfilling the selection criteria together with thirty-one healthy, matched, non-cleft children (control group) were recruited from Faculty of dentistry, Alexandria University. Both groups were divided into three age groups; 4-5 years, 6-7 years and 8-9 years. For each subject, dental arch dimensions were measured from the dental study casts.
RESULTS: Mean maxillary arch depth and inter-canine arch width were significantly smaller in UCLP children than in non-cleft children in the age groups 6-7 and 8-9 years. Mean inter-molar arch width was not significantly narrower in UCLP children from that in non-cleft children. Mean mandibular arch dimensions of UCLP children did not differ significantly from those of non-cleft children.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with UCLP, aging 6-9 years old, revealed significant reduction in mean maxillary arch dimensions when compared to healthy matching non-cleft children except for inter-molar arch width which showed no significant reduction.
Keywords
Unilateral cleft lip and palate/ Maxillary arch dimensions/ Mandibular arch dimensions/ Dental arch depth/ Dental arch width/ Oslo protocol
Main Subjects
Pediatric dentistry
References
1. Marazita ML, Mooney MP. Current concepts in the embryology and genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate. Clin Plast Surg. 2004; 31: 125-40.

2. Cobourne MT. The complex genetics of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 7-16.

3. Rice DP. Craniofacial anomalies: from development to molecular pathogenesis. Curr Mol Med. 2005; 5: 699-722.

4. Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009; 374: 1773- 85.

5. World Health Organization (WHO). Oral Health. Fact Sheet No 38. April 2012. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs3 18/en/ Accessed on 3rd of March 2015.

6. Abyholm FE. Cleft lip and palate in Norway, I. Registration, incidence and early mortality of infants with cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978; 12:29–43.

7. Womersley J, Stone DH. Epidemiology of facial clefts. Arch Dis Child 1987; 62:717–20.

8. Jensen BL, Kreiborg S, Dahl E, Fogh-Andersen P. Cleft lip and palate in Denmark, 1976-1981: Epidemiological, variability, and early somatic development. Cleft Palate J. 1988; 25:258–69.

9. World Health Organization (WHO). What is the burden of oral disease? Available from URL: http://www.who.int/oral_health/disease_burde n/global/en/ Accessed on 3rd of March 2015.

10. Rajab A, Thomas C. Oral clefts in the Sultanate of Oman. Eur J Plast Surg. 2001; 24:230–3.

11. Suleiman AM, Hamzah ST, Abusalab MA, Samaan KT . Prevalence of cleft lip and palate in a hospitalbased population in the Sudan. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005; 15:185–9.

12. Athanasiou AE, Mazaheri M, Zarrinnia K. Longitudinal study of the dental arch dimensions in hard and soft palate clefts. J Pedod. 1987; 12: 35-47.

13. Nystrom M, Ranta R. Sizes of dental arches and interdental space in 3-year-old children with and without cleft lip/palate. Eur J Orthod. 1989; 11: 82-8.

14. da Silva Filho O, Ramos A, Abdo R. The influence of unilateral cleft lip and palate on maxillary dental arch morphology. Angle Orthod. 1992; 62: 283-90.

15. McCance A, Roberts-Harry D, Sherriff M, Mars M, Houston WJ. Sri Lankan cleft lip and palate study model analysis: clefts of the secondary palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993; 30: 227-30.

16. Garrahy A, Millett DT, Ayoub AF. Early assessment of dental arch development in repaired unilateral cleft lip and unilateral cleft lip and palate versus controls. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 385-91.

17. Lewis BR, Stern MR, Willmot DR. Maxillary anterior tooth size and arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008; 45: 639-46.

18. Costello B, Ruiz R. Cleft lip and palate: Comprehensive treatment planning and primary repair. In: Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen PE, Waite P. Peterson’s principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Second ed. Hamilton: BC Decker inc; 2004: 839-58.

19. Fudalej P, Hortis-Dzierzbicka M, Dudkiewicz Z, Semb G. Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following Warsaw (one-stage repair) and Oslo protocols. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009; 46:648-53.

20. Millard RD. Extensions of the rotation-advancement principle for wide unilateral cleft lips. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968; 42:535–44.

21. Stewart TL, Fisher DM, Olson JL. Modified Von Langenbeck Cleft palate repair using an anterior triangular flap: decreased incidence of anterior oronasal fistulas. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009; 46:299-304.

22. Ross ML. A comparative model analysis of untreated cleft palate adults and normal adults. Am J Orthod. 1962; 48:63-64.

23. Pruzansky S, Aduss H. Prevalence of arch collapse and malocclusion in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc. 1967; 43:365-82.

24. Huddart AG, Bodenham RS. Maxillary arch dimensions in normal and unilateral cleft palate subjects. Cleft Palate J. 1969; 6: 471-87.

25. Long RE, Hathaway R, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Russell K, Cohen M et al. The americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48: 239-43.

26. Jones J, Sadove AM, Dean JA, Huebener DV. Multidisciplinary team approach to cleft lip and palate management. In: McDonald R, Avery D, Dean J. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent, Ninth ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2011: 550-60.

27. El-Koutby MM, Hafez SA. Prevalence of malocclusion in the primary and early mixed dentition in a group of Egyptian children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Egypt Dent J. 1993; 39:479-84.

28. Lavelle CL. The shape of dental arch. Am J ORthod. 1975; 67: 176-84.

29. Graber TM. Orthodontics, principles and practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1974: 90-1.

30. Ferguson D J. Growth of the face and dental arches. In: McDonald R, Avery D, Dean J. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent, Ninth ed. Missouri: Mosby; 2011: 550-60.

31. Burdi AR, Moyers RE. Development of the dentition and the occlusion. In: Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics, Fourth ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publisher Inc; 1988: 99-146.

32. Bishara SE, Bayati P, Zaher AR, Jakobsen JR. Comparisons of the dental arch changes in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusions: extraction vs nonextraction treatments. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64: 351-8.

33. Reiser E. Cleft Size and Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Cleft Palate. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 2011.

34. Oosterkamp BC, van der Meer WJ, Rutenfrans M, Dijkstra PU. Reliability of linear measurements on a virtual bilateral cleft lip and palate model. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006; 43:519-23.

35. Skoog T. Plastic Surgery. New methods and refinements. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell; 1974.

36. Kramer GJ, Hoeksma JB, Prahl-Andersen B. Early palatal changes after initial palatal surgery in children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996; 33: 104-11.

37. Athanasiou AE, Mazaheri M, Zarrinnia K. Dental arch dimensions in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1988; 25:139-45.

38. Stein S, Dunsche A, Gellrich NC, Härle F, Jonas I. One-or-Two- stage palate closure in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: Comparing cephalometric and occlusal outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007: 44; 13-22.

39. Derijcke A, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Lekkas C, Hardjowasito W, Latief B. Dental arch dimensions in unoperated adult cleft palate-palate patients: an analysis of 37 cases. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1994; 14: 69-74.

Statistics
Article View: 143
PDF Download: 491